From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ed1-f47.google.com (mail-ed1-f47.google.com [209.85.208.47]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1DB97C8E0 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 16:14:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ed1-f47.google.com with SMTP id f2so4693737edy.13 for ; Mon, 04 Mar 2019 08:14:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=konsulko.com; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=hV6GvAjxdVEbl1+9jY93bS6j/IYrvRRBaKr9lVOyecc=; b=bhJwBAC6l/zMHQ15FptsMK8tlZ0e3D7T2ZdaBCvRXAiRbZogH+1PiInh3FZN/b/VOA +uj2D0kFqPyexAne6ZWHtxZx6aX4l8lKFiOlD3LuF8ulqbuUd+4TMid25aLyANTCmozQ szjzafF56+7sZmoHIdhM+614TMuAcWv1LkA1s= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=hV6GvAjxdVEbl1+9jY93bS6j/IYrvRRBaKr9lVOyecc=; b=e03Zhkl5k3ydRAgk7OcXqXF4EKgYuhG31p/SsIXhq2IMf6HtkNHniZ8n6gdlAiSRRR 2NDbe5IKdoh4QBvAWwabZJxb9cXiZCcOkKecGeliIXsXM6TYeTPfv/yHg2NL3fdjJLCZ ed2Z/pnKyCK3yPz0ZdnioCmTserBMgcXOSq36c4S/8LqfyKLHIGHgCWsrcNyiBuKabwy T41OyxOb/0x673DLN21nji9clTwDbGGhXHeM/5FacisGBFbpjQ4I345gqNKoKEaYjvqe kdKsja7pLIn7WzcHRLqt9K314SAFuz7HfWo989CR/r5WTtxf8OWUyqLBbNZEX9wLkrXx XFlg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXwW0sCUYpxlkfHNCrSWpBC3mpayCiMsCuIItG2mI1wJ2MTbCsT GLpYkSo02jwBfupr7X86vHEt9g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyJVSJc+oATJZTwwIOeKv0l/CS+vW0/ksiy11b3l5STGs2niIvHiQdSRRx1cmhG2mT4LuDqpA== X-Received: by 2002:a50:9063:: with SMTP id z32mr16110002edz.164.1551716088339; Mon, 04 Mar 2019 08:14:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from bill-the-cat (cpe-2606-A000-1401-880D-D0BF-27DA-BE9A-269E.dyn6.twc.com. [2606:a000:1401:880d:d0bf:27da:be9a:269e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d19sm1244847ejb.31.2019.03.04.08.14.46 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 04 Mar 2019 08:14:47 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2019 11:14:43 -0500 From: Tom Rini To: Richard Purdie Message-ID: <20190304161443.GQ5026@bill-the-cat> References: <20190303204731.GK5026@bill-the-cat> <20190303212515.GL5026@bill-the-cat> <20190304155845.GP5026@bill-the-cat> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Cc: OE-core Subject: Re: sstate hash equivalence breaks rm_work X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2019 16:14:48 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 121915 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lLR1BQqf7txDtYcF" Content-Disposition: inline --lLR1BQqf7txDtYcF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 04:06:47PM +0000, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Mon, 2019-03-04 at 10:58 -0500, Tom Rini wrote: > > Ah, so "poky" got me thinking this morning. I was just on bitbake > > v1.40 > > (since I usually use thud, and that's the version for that). Moving > > to > > bitbake master/tip and I don't see the problem anymore. > >=20 > > Is it possible to have some logic within OE to check the version of > > bitbake and throw an error / warning? >=20 > You mean like the BB_MIN_VERSION variable: >=20 > http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky/tree/meta/conf/sanity.conf#n6 >=20 > ? >=20 > :) > > The changes were intended to be backwards compatible hence it wasn't > bumped. Clearly something isn't playing as intended... Yes, that. I think we haven't fully used that well historically since I can only ever recall *kaboom* when using too old of a bitbake rather than a nice sane error message. Looking at https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Releases and then some quick git history, we also must have had that mechanism available when I last ran into something like that even for the fairly ancient jumping around I've had to do a time or three. In fact, can we make BB_MIN_VERSION match the table found there? It doesn't look like we have resources / time to test things on both current and min versions, so we should I think have the min match what we say should be used. --=20 Tom --lLR1BQqf7txDtYcF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJcfU7zAAoJEIf59jXTHXZSkK4QAI2yfwLHtmGM4Jp7/17DwxDt kTu9URdtnMb88xpWsaNRYHTgwB0ofdExPKMRyGEv8jiOULmLvwW7YGvBcJkAXgJ3 s9mrA9n6s/dosgPc2SWKYAckdLOxW2gJ8vwTWLEBti9K7WzUUFzDAtEYL44cRBi6 98LOThXkwlgxaRTz1E1a1rkrj9QZt3vVirhdHQImS3A52RGW3GNW7Z92FNggd7BP JSOtHvNGF5sFxpyNPa8Z0WAaRNRLQ8KkDGr/e8LLWRBbcDtSGdoFP60i94A/hYhg sGfsMfGEZDA8xBLBgJaY/W+k5dcSLv5uz+u+bjWnVKywydZhTafGcYYjnZqZXI2t V8IHHe6HnFMM2Ww2TwSl+cEvtVV9AXH6SMutgQi5g9rfDIrRMNY1rDOMaqMH1jme Mzdg2+vgxEAW/kiaNanniMxgR04iwoI8IBR5/F0zrZk//ljucIlmpayGvtTXD7MB Phj+Mdn8+/6sdgIUiPxYIolQ9JaF/MZbjG3zXy0HNPy7me6JXz3MrzNR6O4A0/LA oyjZxBPKhzDuEcijcm4bQyBQQR7nku1lm1P8cJHxcPd4tVbgLc/zvR1tC6x8MaK7 331HNkiDloK/1JH85U163EPlWQffrIJfrtvNMFU9JWnZA4CgdfUQOdWr96tAbJU1 PcfxmJQ23a6yO2UNC3zI =hc/z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lLR1BQqf7txDtYcF--