From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Peter Kjellerstedt <peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com>
Cc: "OE Core \(openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org\)"
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: Can't build product that uses DEFAULTTUNE="arm926ejs"
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2019 12:45:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190316104552.GC19622@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <395432d08f074e08aafc06ed5d2e4610@XBOX04.axis.com>
On Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 09:21:57AM +0000, Peter Kjellerstedt wrote:
>
> While I agree that your patch will solve the problem with arm926ejs, I
> believe there are advantages in applying my patches instead. In addition
> to fixing the problem with arm926ejs, my patches (patch set 4, not patch
> set 2 that is currently on master-next) also:
>
> * make it so that there is no change to TUNE_FEATURES,
> * make it explicit whether -mcpu or -march is used, and
> * make the extra arguments added to -mcpu or -march for armv8 explicit.
>
> That last point was something that confused me when I read the original
> tune files. I did not realize that those extra features were added to
> whatever -mcpu or -march happened to be added to TUNE_CCARGS before the
> arch-armv8a.inc file was included (especially as it was written to make
> it look as they were only added to the -march option).
For armv8 a larger redesign is actually required - it doesn't scale
to have variables like TUNE_FEATURES_tune-armv8a-crc-crypto with
160k possible combinations[1] in gcc 8.
> //Peter
cu
Adrian
[1] target architectures 8.0-8.4 and 15 feature modifiers
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-16 10:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-11 4:20 Can't build product that uses DEFAULTTUNE="arm926ejs" Peter Kjellerstedt
2019-03-11 4:23 ` Khem Raj
2019-03-11 13:49 ` Peter Kjellerstedt
2019-03-15 5:08 ` Khem Raj
2019-03-16 9:21 ` Peter Kjellerstedt
2019-03-16 10:45 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190316104552.GC19622@localhost \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox