From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr1-f42.google.com (mail-wr1-f42.google.com [209.85.221.42]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 724327D066 for ; Sun, 24 Mar 2019 18:01:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr1-f42.google.com with SMTP id w1so7597130wrp.2 for ; Sun, 24 Mar 2019 11:01:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=u5m3m9Wi0oTMl6znpxcFhDVPVsZ64H+EaOGpbJu10Us=; b=oXc45BbEKS7XwpJYFbX6mhGz3k+zo5nLamd1QpzprqDc0HxCdQ0nwSzEVbzFsVqu6l /ODoVSHWzuyIKQ4A2PSDtpvwGkmn4I8DO0im6w4QWxy0Rl9idXZHt8fs5L2OiEV6fh4p 4o5yhSZ/aNVHwICSHNYx/leegBKM2GHMN2NH1TiIac6BL43ps25zvQGalQXCaAXJX6/9 DAGbG6hVcHD1XjO5TKPN0SY1dYAuHyGOEcKHBr6NXrp4q0DTJm62woZ7h6bE/8MRqQ72 N+BbPTzSvzWgi3XA3WBKKJP53lmqQ8A8CpgwkREDqlkJJSWErwVCpfHLezTcb03TOlsO Vhmw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=u5m3m9Wi0oTMl6znpxcFhDVPVsZ64H+EaOGpbJu10Us=; b=BLXL3Q/7TWMTFsG6i6bcXyIUim5+yFj0pQHUDIYgYpGGn3bPbPER2jzUyPlQ14PnEw KooMqqsO3UnFvsOVz3SEQBmZUBzly83Z8OqBR18dq9v5ESeigV+Z/pYE39c9KU8EVcRX AWEq0+JkG3fnutMi25UReIo2Lp1n+ddGy7TvZn1LtskdsSfG2a3rL96fXAXnS9ou4rtH Y9rpIQOLBcfwg4ilWhWKXKb76Vvgb31MEh/xMmvdjjsbze/oY1MKThC+a7vGLrxUjWVn TbCRy/he/pmzzrmFBkq40ISZCvO7JCuKfbEMnDHRxzTFl0+cTT5/9++fF6LoeurmQjkH L10w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXNklD7adIwAXybnoURs8ZxbEoZq+KKxaadHQWYAfSSD3H9SrSq M+GA+LNQfqgAvAL/HAeEhHQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzMGwj5DJHYpDlqNQnmfRGLB9FBT0bMQ75bJe6/s3Fpf2YV6tMi2cB5qGyl/N2vKhctqbYeZQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:698b:: with SMTP id g11mr10252093wru.65.1553450475149; Sun, 24 Mar 2019 11:01:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (ip-217-030-068-212.aim-net.cz. [217.30.68.212]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l8sm12495613wrv.45.2019.03.24.11.01.13 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sun, 24 Mar 2019 11:01:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Martin Jansa X-Google-Original-From: Martin Jansa Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 19:01:13 +0100 To: Mikko.Rapeli@bmw.de Message-ID: <20190324180113.GA1947@jama> References: <1552927535-19740-1-git-send-email-akuster808@gmail.com> <20190319075206.GK20077@hiutale> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190319075206.GK20077@hiutale> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13) Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [thud][PATCH] Revert "boost: update to 1.69.0" X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 18:01:14 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 122554 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS" Content-Disposition: inline --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 07:52:06AM +0000, Mikko.Rapeli@bmw.de wrote: > On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 06:03:05PM +0100, Andreas M=FCller wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 5:45 PM Armin Kuster wro= te: > > > > > > This reverts commit a384248938ea9db096866bf4ec8678d35ca62a12. > > > > > > This package update slipped in doing the maint process. Removing it. > > > Just my opinion - don't consider this as NAK. > >=20 > > * I already fixed the recipes that failed for me. For at least one the > > change is no more compatible to 1.68.0. > > * This makes PV going backwards > >=20 > > Thanks for addressing - what do others think? >=20 > I'm not using thud yet, but updating boost in stable branch would break > too many things and I would have to revert that change in our trees. Some= boost > updates are in the end quite trivial and just require recompiling > everything but still, I would prefer that boost is not updated in stable > branches unless there is a huge security/stability issue with the old ver= sion. Agreed. I care less for PV going backwards nowadays, it's probably less annoying th= an bumping PE first in master and then backporting PE bump to thud. People with build issues related to boost upgrade probably never built whole image to push it as an upgrade to end devices. Cheers, --=20 Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EARECAB0WIQRU+ejDffEzV2Je2oc3VSO3ZXaAHAUCXJfF6AAKCRA3VSO3ZXaA HKOyAJ0eeX3AUI+N8kSEoRDwy1ksPwa2nwCguujaw/Wjej3Sg2mMCSDTMZHWQYo= =4dtq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS--