From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm1-f41.google.com (mail-wm1-f41.google.com [209.85.128.41]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBE597CB12 for ; Sun, 24 Mar 2019 18:48:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm1-f41.google.com with SMTP id f3so6716648wmj.4 for ; Sun, 24 Mar 2019 11:48:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Vzfk8Q8qvOPLW+0qxl58HGooD9q60eNYg/8reNd03kE=; b=cqf2AMx68mori194cgWYWmF2nARixSVVf/8Xf51MIAK7i6hzrYAXw4dudbz38ztN/A m0hCayd383YmoY8c8ny94sthASUWKkmclbLaZaOqMoDfKrL+HrN3tA3p143F0owMEo2e oLwPCxEHq/0aQDhPLqnDW4aEAYZIEDdofvypKKtbh4YGD2yZyMDL2bHUo3RQ6U0A0Xwi uLuKupEgNxboXY3ESFtrgpDYIa5O0N0qwSF23BdRcg4LeK0ThIfTBclySZTFCIcPR7uE wlJXhK8DdHbXvg/4gN3Zro/WnX5111XtWxfmevq2hjyO63pqb2heRe1SReZfxCPSNWlw Styw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Vzfk8Q8qvOPLW+0qxl58HGooD9q60eNYg/8reNd03kE=; b=ie1lxnt71266NdPBhjnH+TxMGgMGd37w7UGPEOPvuG/5GpFfIPcglaGtxNSZE+qmtB B/jXB9ACF8bLu8d8j9SqAPKa4OdpdsIh1HMy4uT424oJAzMSglosh39wjk/INg5s/0Tr xeS4klqtqQAJw5Amwuo58IHn2KXcVnmrNa4I0SpNmXN/Vig/tNPUfL571A0fkINTOm7q eBWN+IiWNkQMMPm/ms4N38Du+syj/Yq9K37xjHuUHma305K9c6s7j8y1zYW09gN4iLw+ D9ylu/yxIqmupPCG24/4iNRmhqTYqO8cY7qvvPvvHs38D0BoVqjPyGk6GvzQwuasu1qG umIw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXj3qWtw4mQB4rpdWXsYlX8JRUdqgqzPK2LXDrwdXk3CNOu1U3u moF35hbufOAFOp4gdxJt2Q8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyI7FLDKshlYacAlSlrqqc5027STiywauUrxsVQW3U2kjALyGhAd2qdKr8BwNzU+jANW0wg3w== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cd95:: with SMTP id y21mr8604975wmj.29.1553453284654; Sun, 24 Mar 2019 11:48:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (ip-217-030-068-212.aim-net.cz. [217.30.68.212]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l8sm12572644wrv.45.2019.03.24.11.48.03 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sun, 24 Mar 2019 11:48:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Martin Jansa X-Google-Original-From: Martin Jansa Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 19:48:03 +0100 To: akuster808 Message-ID: <20190324184803.GB1947@jama> References: <1552927535-19740-1-git-send-email-akuster808@gmail.com> <20190319075206.GK20077@hiutale> <20190324180113.GA1947@jama> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13) Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [thud][PATCH] Revert "boost: update to 1.69.0" X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 18:48:04 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 122556 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/NkBOFFp2J2Af1nK" Content-Disposition: inline --/NkBOFFp2J2Af1nK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 11:45:08AM -0700, akuster808 wrote: >=20 >=20 > On 3/24/19 11:01 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 07:52:06AM +0000, Mikko.Rapeli@bmw.de wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 06:03:05PM +0100, Andreas M=FCller wrote: > >>> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 5:45 PM Armin Kuster w= rote: > >>>> This reverts commit a384248938ea9db096866bf4ec8678d35ca62a12. > >>>> > >>>> This package update slipped in doing the maint process. Removing it. > >> > >>> Just my opinion - don't consider this as NAK. > >>> > >>> * I already fixed the recipes that failed for me. For at least one the > >>> change is no more compatible to 1.68.0. > >>> * This makes PV going backwards > >>> > >>> Thanks for addressing - what do others think? > >> I'm not using thud yet, but updating boost in stable branch would break > >> too many things and I would have to revert that change in our trees. S= ome boost > >> updates are in the end quite trivial and just require recompiling > >> everything but still, I would prefer that boost is not updated in stab= le > >> branches unless there is a huge security/stability issue with the old = version. > > Agreed. > > > > I care less for PV going backwards nowadays, it's probably less annoyin= g than > > bumping PE first in master and then backporting PE bump to thud. > > > > People with build issues related to boost upgrade probably never > > built whole image to push it as an upgrade to end devices. >=20 > So do you agree with the revert? I do. --=20 Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com --/NkBOFFp2J2Af1nK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EARECAB0WIQRU+ejDffEzV2Je2oc3VSO3ZXaAHAUCXJfQ4QAKCRA3VSO3ZXaA HFF5AKCmHG2NK4oBSOjeMjyCnUC6n7U2xwCfXk/iHxlhoD3vQkyIrIQOYLwnFTo= =GaXz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/NkBOFFp2J2Af1nK--