From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.stusta.mhn.de (mail.stusta.mhn.de [141.84.69.5]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37B9A79C7C for ; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 07:15:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.stusta.mhn.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 45TtQ34kgpz2M; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 09:15:39 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=stusta.de; s=default; t=1561014940; bh=X4i1gsuCsKcAFQHOWtTHj78Rf6VbEq8OxHdkTiOl6Zk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=eHyOBAT7mSJ5CTQocgTtQbZMHRFExy+8k7cn9ejZyGBQJ1DF9eNcH9zsXvJdcWFOp e7+k/5KH+jNsKZGWVBoLAzrJWRpy8/LGMeWOiSRkj0FytjjZzsJIRYjqo3ORKq/gx0 0/ggpa9xG35spY/a6MDTebIdyEdoMuQ4coABdECe4nQjEthxEV8fGXSFNTETfO9zvg dMnLVU2MwO7YI+LShDCSFqMV+0BS5wKlkuMaYenEc6/zZEdJiruN4PU6KkCEZvdqX2 ttoFJVx7+ngCVbzMhBjXnGi2TdNaTTNwGFLGImyPoVYvYNKsLVj8dqQKMJzKhRJnAF BteiWEGwtnRL0BVgiTpuP3dXgYfFeb1byu9BUMIr2itkwiGana3RQQLpam1V7fbWJ6 469SQUR0mkjESyW7NGUyD2qFO6MIc3NqOdHGVz/LrypcCpOZ6Ha+MhesukRButww4s ylQ679DT5WKhZbFYT7Vonay+SPhmi6IK/9jKsD1w9dinVh4bHJogw+U33agJqREATC uCNq8k47K7zpyR67YTQEQNp3Yv9QTTnwawlEMfoJEn6/RsqgdDIb8XwU0k6jERod4b F1Y0Jx42Il+V9GgA6y/XuwFvjxBvHh349u1kNtjGru/Sh/WtIBmvM01sX8ckmYNP38 DNjdb5QcscSh2QZH3igeGT5c= Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 10:15:37 +0300 From: Adrian Bunk To: Khem Raj Message-ID: <20190620071537.GA27107@localhost> References: <20190614072956.13672-1-bunk@stusta.de> <34f4c3911dcbb9e4856848a27a87ed6f6a9a3d4d.camel@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] systemd: Remove clearly incorrect musl patches X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 07:15:40 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 12:59:05PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 4:44 AM Richard Purdie < > richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > > On Fri, 2019-06-14 at 10:29 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > This removes clearly incorrect musl patches and marks > > > systemd as incompatible with musl until these issues > > > are fixed. > > > > > > The previous status quo where systemd was made compiling > > > with patches that are known to introduce bugs and security > > > vulnerabilities silently delivered a sub-standard package > > > to users, this change makes it clear where work is needed > > > to be done by people interested in systemd on musl. > > > > > > Patches that are merely questionable or not upstreamable > > > are not touched. > > > > I'll be interested to see what others think of this, I can't imagine > > this move being very popular... > > There are real products using this combination An OE-only combination neither upstream supports. > And this is not a good message, eventually we want to either fix or stop > supporting this but I think now is not the time When is the time? In a month? Before the Yocto 2.8 branching? After the Yocto 2.8 branching? The best solution would be if someone would step up to properly maintain the systemd/musl combination, but usually such "either fix or stop" only work with a clear deadline. cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed