From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
Cc: Otavio Salvador <otavio.salvador@ossystems.com.br>,
Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: Conflict of systemd and sysvinit
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 21:23:17 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190827182317.GB29638@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3e6e1e23-ead9-7982-0bc1-49639638a216@windriver.com>
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 12:22:30PM -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
> On 8/19/19 11:49 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 1:48 PM Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com> wrote:
> >> On 8/19/19 11:27 AM, Ross Burton wrote:
> >>> On 19/08/2019 11:37, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >>>> On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 11:00 PM Kang Kai <Kai.Kang@windriver.com> wrote:
> >>>>> On 2019/8/18 上午3:27, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >>>>> Would you like to give more detailed steps how the error occurred? And
> >>>>> what's extra settings in you local.conf please?
> >>>>
> >>>> I had sysvinit and systemd enabled.
> >>>
> >>> The autobuilder should be exercising this, so when it's fixed we need to
> >>> ensure the AB covers the case Otavio is hitting.
> >>
> >> If they are both enabled what is the expected functionality of the system?
> >> (which is init, etc...)
> >
> > The image needs to pick the desired ones.
>
> Ok.. so build both packages.. and then come install time, one or the other must
> be in the PACKAGE_INSTALL (however the image chooses to do this), and the other
> should NOT be included.
>
> This could be problematic, as I've seen recipes build with systemd dependencies
> in them. (Both initscripts as well as system health monitoring and such.. That
> would conflict with a sysvinit [or systemd] if configured for the other.)
> Someone may need to review dependencies in the system looking for things that
> depend on systemd... or have a systemd/sysvinit 'conflict' of some kind. (I've
> not attempted such an audit before.)
>...
Dependencies on libsystemd are not a problem in sysvinit systems,
assuming there is proper runtime fallback code.
Shipping both an init script and a systemd unit file is also not a problem.
In Debian you can just switch the init system and reboot and it works,
with all the other binary packages unchanged.
> --Mark
cu
Adrian
BTW: There are problems like how to make GNOME happy without systemd,
and there is a lack of people in Debian working actively on the
sysvinit side. But on a high level the problems you were worried
about are "works in Debian".
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-27 18:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-17 19:27 Conflict of systemd and sysvinit Otavio Salvador
2019-08-19 1:59 ` Kang Kai
2019-08-19 10:37 ` Otavio Salvador
2019-08-19 16:27 ` Ross Burton
2019-08-19 16:47 ` Mark Hatle
2019-08-19 16:49 ` Otavio Salvador
2019-08-19 17:22 ` Mark Hatle
2019-08-27 18:23 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190827182317.GB29638@localhost \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=mark.hatle@windriver.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=otavio.salvador@ossystems.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox