From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] xz: Remove GPLv3 license checksum
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 23:27:29 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190904202729.GB21155@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <32b3f42b-2ff1-79c8-2777-b9a788190969@windriver.com>
On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 08:07:58AM -0400, Mark Hatle wrote:
> On 9/3/19 1:59 PM, Wes Lindauer wrote:
>...
> > In reference to "It typically does NOT include the license of things used to
> > build the software (such as makefiles, autoconf fragments, etc)".
> > Since the only file that is licensed under GPLv3 is a M4 macro, does that mean
> > the current patch is still valid? Shouldn't the GPLv3 license be removed from
> > this recipe?
>
> Unless the M4 file is generating/injecting code into the build(very few I've
> seen do this),
>...
If the defines in config.h are "code" then many do.
> --Mark
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-04 20:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-16 19:44 [PATCH 1/6] iw: Fix license field to BSD-2-Clause Wes Lindauer
2019-08-16 19:44 ` [PATCH 2/6] openssh: Update LICENSE field with missing values Wes Lindauer
2019-08-16 19:44 ` [PATCH 3/6] shadow: Fix BSD license file checksum Wes Lindauer
2019-08-16 19:44 ` [PATCH 4/6] sudo: " Wes Lindauer
2019-08-16 19:44 ` [PATCH 5/6] libunwind: Fix MIT " Wes Lindauer
2019-08-16 19:44 ` [PATCH 6/6] xz: Remove GPLv3 license checksum Wes Lindauer
2019-08-16 20:50 ` Khem Raj
2019-08-27 17:34 ` Wes Lindauer
2019-08-27 18:04 ` Adrian Bunk
2019-08-27 18:27 ` Mark Hatle
2019-09-03 18:59 ` Wes Lindauer
2019-09-04 12:07 ` Mark Hatle
2019-09-04 18:50 ` Richard Purdie
2019-09-04 19:53 ` Adrian Bunk
2019-09-04 20:18 ` Mark Hatle
2019-09-04 20:30 ` Mark Hatle
2019-09-04 20:36 ` richard.purdie
2019-09-05 9:35 ` Peter Kjellerstedt
2019-09-04 20:27 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2019-09-04 20:42 ` Mark Hatle
2019-09-05 5:40 ` Adrian Bunk
2019-08-16 20:02 ` ✗ patchtest: failure for "iw: Fix license field to BSD-2..." and 5 more Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190904202729.GB21155@localhost \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=mark.hatle@windriver.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox