From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-yw1-f68.google.com (mail-yw1-f68.google.com [209.85.161.68]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38FF37D278 for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 17:45:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yw1-f68.google.com with SMTP id w140so8897044ywd.0 for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 10:45:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=konsulko.com; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=KNqasQmml+8EooAEzXQALeWh+e2vlxpznvmLXserViQ=; b=jYi5znjg7Pp3vbcG2WCTJr6e29Mqk6McM3YT+jA0lgVUq/eAQyZYo+ZqSfAHRX4nNR m/z3hrm9huHlLQlFWQ1TR75o7ep5odbSV0zXaOFZuvl+cQKV/GC8MtKieWDHyye+IWP6 J/aI0iUaJnHnfts1ky3XTf8V40cvngrss8udA= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=KNqasQmml+8EooAEzXQALeWh+e2vlxpznvmLXserViQ=; b=D6B2jFEvhYpwr6NyN2NOrLaePghbv7W1OsGnKJR9O/gFn0CLKldgBBDRGNNnWoPFPN Anu+K5/qXJWQElDOrXriYnU4FqsydMyo+MRZnlSI3Hay05aI/6L1p/tN70wF8+SHG6qs 5e7/BZgK3dxUNNidl2YEtZBDxJOVKrtQNOBcFklDT09H/aoZVtTDEU3im/CoxocxJT9n knNKXbFgHCDZsWGrADQedu+OuvMnSnhPnGZNqJ1Fnn+ilYnlcK23r8qjLef0OZiQrbtu n9vZ5/94ddkjHZXgNXF+Cfa36wbHlbrzAcA9b6pY8KQX1NBDYoXQG9nvjq6uLknAjPKp mtzw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX2ChI0Smxlktgd4xQHdP1KiSbDeKSWYeiLO0GptAtQ9PvRvlAJ yT2NvFhODTzpnwoF9q9AOOizDe7/cxZurQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxtaIaYHuLUyUE3C0O/VFxZaehE/o4un/7E6hS07hzwiqq62J1IBIR4idUqhAExbPf3vD2Chg== X-Received: by 2002:a0d:f1c2:: with SMTP id a185mr7608692ywf.298.1571939155917; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 10:45:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bill-the-cat (cpe-65-184-142-8.ec.res.rr.com. [65.184.142.8]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x201sm5318135ywx.34.2019.10.24.10.45.54 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 24 Oct 2019 10:45:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 13:45:52 -0400 From: Tom Rini To: Adrian Bunk Message-ID: <20191024174552.GO11173@bill-the-cat> References: <20191021094149.uwvkismntthgd7i3@pengutronix.de> <20191021102440.GA25961@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191021102440.GA25961@localhost> X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Cc: mfe@pengutronix.de, kernel@pengutronix.de, openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: Why do we still disable mke2fs 64bit support? X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 17:45:55 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 130455 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XPfPv5HFi+O4rHSw" Content-Disposition: inline --XPfPv5HFi+O4rHSw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 01:24:40PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 11:41:49AM +0200, Marco Felsch wrote: > > Hi, > >=20 > > during a initial system-setup script the mke2fs tools complains about > > the missing 64bit support: > >=20 > > 8<---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > mke2fs 1.44.5 (15-Dec-2018) > > 64-bit filesystem support is not enabled. The larger fields afforded by > > this feature enable full-strength checksumming. Pass -O 64bit to rectif= y. > > 8<---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >=20 > > Other build tools e.g. PTXdist or Buildroot don't modify the build-in > > config. I know in the early days this feature break something but > > shouldn't we (re-)think this decision? >=20 > Already fixed in zeus: > https://github.com/openembedded/openembedded-core/commit/f5edce401cfb31eb= d0200adaba9a201caf7ea705 I suppose as this point we just hope that there's not going to be still more boards found in the wild where U-Boot is old enough to silently corrupt on write or fail to find things on read. And with my cranky U-Boot hat on, is there another new on-by-default feature that'll prevent writing (or worse, reading) ext4 again? --=20 Tom --XPfPv5HFi+O4rHSw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEE6HLbQJwaaH776GM2h/n2NdMddlIFAl2x40wACgkQh/n2NdMd dlIVIw/+PgUw9bBQ5oTnFzdaVNVDFZVvfbOQHptjk8/eS/jpvEa5vhH2dRGGws42 W5ETFGk57CSdRHOSXQf+gWCPSm2OJQsaNaBSyeXpLVsEeqwiC7tWu8+jx6/BOcpT npZBPfGYgCCy2QvDQfXYc14eeevW8xn5OY1J4+KAP1BLj8oaoJMomlPomaYKpnxB KEgSc9TcCHvAD/cxpshPTgea/Vpi6qL7niJPrqN9j41NENaDs9cm8R5l4KaGgILw 434Z8gkX0lz2G+O0oINwswNmUcly4WlWHsnYa3VfvvZrk2tOqIwgCBGtXYwePmbU Yj+vOHdGSZHhIoVdpzIXk/awL1sCPYuDipibQzz3ZseaiR6BnzK5dvvIBgj7br8r qLW4kvk93ciuFfwLdXsiEJfCzvxWTb6Hk2UIN89KV8JD3mFWZxfD2mEr+LMSdTqe EaBxC8eQEUDYzWTQxxFdXNiAfHi/euJeQMoMjiqfezC8gGyHenUDlGK/tad2B05S 8xNbysa4i9v959xivQC3GIOPAKMQzrUEmrF23nbbAqdc8S1NyXCnZ6fpLdD1+oYV 89Yq+hY7dY919pNgszwswUhHeRG9ywDQrRz+foyfzlsjhzOeX1r5UlrxeZ5soirn e3JQqmIX8eE5IbWVXxkg7BYpLVUqMGiYACFM+MVyKY6cWoOaK0A= =rc93 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XPfPv5HFi+O4rHSw--