Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patchwork <patchwork@patchwork.openembedded.org>
To: shuagr97@gmail.com
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: ✗ patchtest: failure for libgcrypt: CVE-2019-12904 fix Upstream-Status: Backport Signed-off-by: Shubham Agrawal<shuagr@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 18:32:53 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191031183253.2332.18474@do> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1572545645-64707-1-git-send-email-shuagr@microsoft.com>

== Series Details ==

Series: libgcrypt: CVE-2019-12904 fix Upstream-Status: Backport Signed-off-by: Shubham Agrawal<shuagr@microsoft.com>
Revision: 1
URL   : https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/20842/
State : failure

== Summary ==


Thank you for submitting this patch series to OpenEmbedded Core. This is
an automated response. Several tests have been executed on the proposed
series by patchtest resulting in the following failures:



* Patch            [thud] libgcrypt: CVE-2019-12904 fix Upstream-Status: Backport Signed-off-by: Shubham Agrawal<shuagr@microsoft.com>
 Issue             Commit shortlog is too long [test_shortlog_length] 
  Suggested fix    Edit shortlog so that it is 90 characters or less (currently 108 characters)

* Patch            [thud] libgcrypt: CVE-2019-12904 fix Upstream-Status: Backport Signed-off-by: Shubham Agrawal<shuagr@microsoft.com>
 Issue             Patch is missing Signed-off-by [test_signed_off_by_presence] 
  Suggested fix    Sign off the patch (either manually or with "git commit --amend -s")

* Issue             Upstream-Status is in incorrect format [test_upstream_status_presence_format] 
  Suggested fix    Fix Upstream-Status format in CVE-2019-12904_p2.patch
  Current          Upstream-status: Backport 
  Standard format  Upstream-Status: <Valid status>
  Valid status     Pending, Accepted, Backport, Denied, Inappropriate [reason], Submitted [where]



If you believe any of these test results are incorrect, please reply to the
mailing list (openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org) raising your concerns.
Otherwise we would appreciate you correcting the issues and submitting a new
version of the patchset if applicable. Please ensure you add/increment the
version number when sending the new version (i.e. [PATCH] -> [PATCH v2] ->
[PATCH v3] -> ...).

---
Guidelines:     https://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Commit_Patch_Message_Guidelines
Test framework: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/patchtest
Test suite:     http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/patchtest-oe



      reply	other threads:[~2019-10-31 18:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-31 18:14 [thud][PATCH] libgcrypt: CVE-2019-12904 fix Upstream-Status: Backport Signed-off-by: Shubham Agrawal<shuagr@microsoft.com> shuagr97
2019-10-31 18:32 ` Patchwork [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191031183253.2332.18474@do \
    --to=patchwork@patchwork.openembedded.org \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=shuagr97@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox