From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: "André Draszik" <git@andred.net>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] bitbake.conf: omit XZ threads and RAM from sstate signatures
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 17:10:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200224151041.GE27036@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5639b75022c28419467aefb8de62c6ab24f9eae6.camel@andred.net>
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 02:58:21PM +0000, André Draszik wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-02-24 at 16:31 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 02:21:57PM +0000, André Draszik wrote:
> > > ...
> > > Once the artefact has been created, it doesn't matter anymore how it
> > > was created, as long as the high-level options aren't being changed (like
> > > an explicit compression level, checksum method, etc.)
> > > ...
> >
> > meta-poky/conf/distro/poky.conf:INHERIT += "reproducible_build"
>
> I still maintain these are two different problems. I am not trying to fix
> reproducible builds.
But won't fixing reproducible builds require reverting the patch you
suggest for fixing your problem?
> Cheers,
> A.
cu
Adrian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-24 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-24 12:59 [PATCH v2] bitbake.conf: omit XZ threads and RAM from sstate signatures André Draszik
2020-02-24 13:40 ` Adrian Bunk
2020-02-24 14:21 ` André Draszik
2020-02-24 14:31 ` Adrian Bunk
2020-02-24 14:58 ` André Draszik
2020-02-24 15:10 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2020-02-25 11:16 ` reproducible builds involving xz (was: Re: [PATCH v2] bitbake.conf: omit XZ threads and RAM from sstate signatures) André Draszik
2020-02-25 11:23 ` Richard Purdie
2020-02-24 16:44 ` [PATCH v2] bitbake.conf: omit XZ threads and RAM from sstate signatures Richard Purdie
2020-02-24 17:12 ` Adrian Bunk
2020-02-24 17:14 ` André Draszik
2020-02-24 17:32 ` Richard Purdie
2020-02-24 22:00 ` Adrian Bunk
2020-02-25 9:16 ` André Draszik
2020-02-25 9:54 ` Adrian Bunk
2020-02-26 15:26 ` xz threads / memlimit behaviour (was: Re: [PATCH v2] bitbake.conf: omit XZ threads and RAM from sstate signatures) André Draszik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200224151041.GE27036@localhost \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=git@andred.net \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox