Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul Barker" <pbarker@konsulko.com>
To: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo@ribalda.com>
Cc: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>,
	openembedded-core <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] wic: Fix permissions when using exclude or include path
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2020 20:02:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200407200236.748931eb@ub1910> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPybu_3LK7Qj9qSYW8oR=21u5zDz2UbdSe6oV8s6hHQ_COXVxA@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 7 Apr 2020 20:40:18 +0200
Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo@ribalda.com> wrote:

> Hi Paul
> 
> Thanks for your review, It has been already merged, but if there is
> something wrong we can send a patch fixing it.
> 
> https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=36993eea89d1c011397b7692b9b8d61b499d0171
> 
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 8:13 PM Paul Barker <pbarker@konsulko.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 21:53:39 +0200
> > Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo@ribalda.com> wrote:
> >  
> > > ping?  
> >
> > I think that '../pseudo' should not be used here. I'll explain inline...
> >  
> > > >
> > > > This results in a rootfs owned by the user that is running the wic
> > > > command (usually UID 1000), which makes some rootfs unbootable.
> > > >
> > > > To fix this we copy the content of the pseudo folders to the new folder
> > > > and modify the pseudo database using the "pseudo -B" command.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo@ribalda.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  scripts/lib/wic/plugins/source/rootfs.py | 22 +++++++++++++++++++---
> > > >  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/scripts/lib/wic/plugins/source/rootfs.py b/scripts/lib/wic/plugins/source/rootfs.py
> > > > index 705aeb5563..40419a64b3 100644
> > > > --- a/scripts/lib/wic/plugins/source/rootfs.py
> > > > +++ b/scripts/lib/wic/plugins/source/rootfs.py
> > > > @@ -16,11 +16,11 @@ import os
> > > >  import shutil
> > > >  import sys
> > > >
> > > > -from oe.path import copyhardlinktree
> > > > +from oe.path import copyhardlinktree, copytree
> > > >
> > > >  from wic import WicError
> > > >  from wic.pluginbase import SourcePlugin
> > > > -from wic.misc import get_bitbake_var
> > > > +from wic.misc import get_bitbake_var, exec_native_cmd
> > > >
> > > >  logger = logging.getLogger('wic')
> > > >
> > > > @@ -44,6 +44,15 @@ class RootfsPlugin(SourcePlugin):
> > > >
> > > >          return os.path.realpath(image_rootfs_dir)
> > > >
> > > > +    @staticmethod
> > > > +    def __get_pseudo(native_sysroot, rootfs):
> > > > +        pseudo = "export PSEUDO_PREFIX=%s/usr;" % native_sysroot
> > > > +        pseudo += "export PSEUDO_LOCALSTATEDIR=%s;" % os.path.join(rootfs, "../pseudo")
> > > > +        pseudo += "export PSEUDO_PASSWD=%s;" % rootfs
> > > > +        pseudo += "export PSEUDO_NOSYMLINKEXP=1;"
> > > > +        pseudo += "%s " % get_bitbake_var("FAKEROOTCMD")
> > > > +        return pseudo
> > > > +
> > > >      @classmethod
> > > >      def do_prepare_partition(cls, part, source_params, cr, cr_workdir,
> > > >                               oe_builddir, bootimg_dir, kernel_dir,
> > > > @@ -78,9 +87,16 @@ class RootfsPlugin(SourcePlugin):
> > > >
> > > >              if os.path.lexists(new_rootfs):
> > > >                  shutil.rmtree(os.path.join(new_rootfs))
> > > > -
> > > >              copyhardlinktree(part.rootfs_dir, new_rootfs)
> > > >
> > > > +            if os.path.lexists(os.path.join(new_rootfs, "../pseudo")):  
> >
> > new_rootfs is set by the following statement a few lines above:
> >
> >     new_rootfs = os.path.realpath(os.path.join(cr_workdir, "rootfs%d" % part.lineno))
> >
> > Consider that `cr_workdir` may contain multiple rootfs staging directories
> > corresponding to multiple lines in the wks file, for example if a rootfs
> > image is duplicated into multiple partitions for redundancy. In that case
> > `os.path.join(new_rootfs, "../pseudo")` will clash between these different
> > rootfs copies.
> >
> > Let's use an explicit path instead, such as:
> >
> >     new_pseudo = os.path.realpath(os.path.join(cr_workdir, "pseudo%d" % part.lineno))  
> 
> The reason to have that path was to follow the same structure as the
> real image.bb.
> 
> If there are multiple partitions on the .wic file the different
> partitions are done one by one, not
> in parallel.
> 
> So
> ../pseudo will be created  for partition1
> then it will be used to generate the partition1
> 
> ../pseudo will be deleted
> ../pseudo will be created  for partition2
> 
> Even if they use the same partition, the code works (and ../pseudo is
> useless once the partition is generated)
> 

Having these separate is important for debugging though, it lets you look
through the different copies after wic exits if something is wrong.

> >  
> > > > +                shutil.rmtree(os.path.join(new_rootfs, "../pseudo"))
> > > > +            copytree(os.path.join(part.rootfs_dir, "../pseudo"),  
> >
> > part.rootfs_dir is whatever is given as the option to `--rootfs-dir`. There
> > is no guarantee that `../psuedo` is valid or if it corresponds to the rootfs
> > directory given. It's unsafe to step up the directory tree and make
> > assumptions like this.  
> 
> I think that if we do not pass a real rootfs to the rootfs plugin it
> is an error from the user.
> 
> We can add a more beautiful error message instead of a backtrace.
> 
> Or if you believe that it is a valid usecase to not pass a rootfs then
> we can continue with a warning/debug message and explicitly telling
> the user that the permissions are going to be invalid, because what he
> is using as a roofs is an unknow directory for bitbake.

This is a valid and existing usecase. This is how data partitions are
populated and how you separate /home or another directory into its own
partiton (e.g.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/56187209/yocto-create-and-populate-a-separate-home-partition).

> 
> I have no personal preference for any of the two, tell me what do you
> prefer (or a different option) and I will implement it.
> 
> Thans again for the review.
> 

This patch needs reverting from master/dunfell. I hope it hasn't gone into
the M4 build...

-- 
Paul Barker
Konsulko Group

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-07 19:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-04  8:34 [PATCH 1/2] wic: Fix permissions when using exclude or include path Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2020-03-04  8:34 ` [PATCH 2/2] wic: Add --embed-rootfs argument Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2020-03-04  9:42   ` Paul Barker
2020-03-04  9:56     ` Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2020-03-04 10:08       ` Paul Barker
2020-03-04 10:14         ` Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2020-03-04 13:49           ` Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2020-03-04 14:31             ` Joshua Watt
2020-03-04  9:53 ` [PATCH 1/2] wic: Fix permissions when using exclude or include path Paul Barker
2020-03-04 10:02   ` Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2020-03-05  9:28     ` Paul Barker
2020-03-05  9:46       ` Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2020-04-03 19:53         ` [OE-core] " Ricardo Ribalda
2020-04-07 18:12           ` Paul Barker
2020-04-07 18:40             ` Ricardo Ribalda
2020-04-07 19:02               ` Paul Barker [this message]
2020-04-07 19:19                 ` Ricardo Ribalda
2020-04-07 19:43                   ` Paul Barker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200407200236.748931eb@ub1910 \
    --to=pbarker@konsulko.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=ricardo@ribalda.com \
    --cc=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox