Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Adrian Bunk" <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: chris.laplante@agilent.com, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>,
	"openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org"
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [OE-core] Uninative for i386 native tool?
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 17:52:11 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200420145211.GA2315@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <207860401ddfafd8de45143986549873935deff7.camel@linuxfoundation.org>

On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 11:15:55PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-04-19 at 21:58 +0000, Chris Laplante via
> lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> > One possible work around which I'm using for some prebuilt native
> > binaries is to call them with hosts loader (e.g. /lib32/ld-linux.so.2 
> > ${STAGING_BINDIR_NATIVE}/my-tool params)
> >  
> > Ooh, nice. Thanks for the tip! Definitely curious about a longer-term 
> > workaround but this is good for the short term.  
> 
> I suspect uninative assumes all binaries are for the main system
> architecture so its probably trying to change the interpreter to a 64
> bit one which clearly won't work in this case.
> 
> It would be a question of stopping it for these binaries somehow...

uninative is default but optional, would
  INHERIT_remove = "uninative"
solve this problem?

> Cheers,
> 
> Richard

cu
Adrian

      parent reply	other threads:[~2020-04-20 14:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-19 21:37 Uninative for i386 native tool? Chris Laplante
2020-04-19 21:49 ` [OE-core] " Martin Jansa
2020-04-19 21:58   ` Chris Laplante
2020-04-19 22:15     ` Richard Purdie
2020-04-20 13:56       ` Chris Laplante
2020-04-20 14:03         ` Richard Purdie
2020-04-20 15:15           ` Chris Laplante
2020-04-20 15:24             ` Richard Purdie
     [not found]       ` <16078BB604B2F7AB.6073@lists.openembedded.org>
2020-04-20 14:00         ` Chris Laplante
2020-04-20 14:52       ` Adrian Bunk [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200420145211.GA2315@localhost \
    --to=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=chris.laplante@agilent.com \
    --cc=martin.jansa@gmail.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox