From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pg1-f193.google.com (mail-pg1-f193.google.com [209.85.215.193]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web10.1745.1589477414449422500 for ; Thu, 14 May 2020 10:30:14 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=gqIpln+G; spf=pass (domain: gmail.com, ip: 209.85.215.193, mailfrom: raj.khem@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pg1-f193.google.com with SMTP id f6so1534072pgm.1 for ; Thu, 14 May 2020 10:30:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=84wJTmHipKBumV9pzB6i1hKN5a5an2wJ+OwBYrbN9r0=; b=gqIpln+G8WSLXAE719aKcQmD7b/PNHopuFn+Jr1a5PD++qXemyHshYPAmBXvXwbD9B PO4oK7XMU/DGP4n8RNC+TUg2ZkJUmeZ9e6DxdaEG39AcZo6BVlIw3W19BdlSKQdzpIEg KXOIJ1d81v/daiu3yhaGdCviQMmNztjn/xsZuLLZJLokicOk2kcylnGU7qjzaaLCR6RL LH1r0AGUSPtmNIXykp+CIhYw7RjNKfFZQWC1BWa2qU6bSy4JNwknAIdU8SLvQGtlEMc4 K6wnehVB5m4QZ+liFf8eiR7/wgdVYp0qxBljt2AaQgbRpVrBVdzX/8ER4j3lrWiPmBTp 9uUA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=84wJTmHipKBumV9pzB6i1hKN5a5an2wJ+OwBYrbN9r0=; b=YYYEK0FninOqy2TA2fBjm9IhKfLpBWTGECORls2rZH6h0cb6l8455mUd7q/L+5X1y5 2w/JdX0b5Nv2oKSwKjY6R9s9iw5cls9xks5QjUc3ugRM30cTVG0csbVYW/VXfoNedeBa bAsyZH5z2+8ZpmQAWTWD8FcMX2otqFHPAOzWaNNHfkMIYK24w66Wy1A8Nf+NIFQZnHQU MwYZcjCe8H1eJidHNmIn5vTycgaCF3GSN2ORTBwzjUHbJap9oaG3qps4uxAI0fKAfGTK kgYBQY3BdTEBLPivywTVefesy2+6/vJITkXGRD7xQAYz4UFokQccuwh3qhvZ6Q9zg7c+ cJSQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530xMXmBGDVAfGOUWthLfI2whJ6faKjLSTADJmeB/pHbhGAuJ0cg xYXnX1W+PGbGkMRHP5SP93rPZ7Caj9M= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzT2sVPUyv75DB1o195EHyAW9lCdbtKcv8BJO3kjMhqVfsui89bx9ByPifaH69yHeSU8NHGkw== X-Received: by 2002:a65:6094:: with SMTP id t20mr5122523pgu.220.1589477413580; Thu, 14 May 2020 10:30:13 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from apollo.hsd1.ca.comcast.net ([2601:646:9200:4e0::3cf8]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a21sm1977460pfk.32.2020.05.14.10.30.12 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 14 May 2020 10:30:13 -0700 (PDT) From: "Khem Raj" To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Cc: Khem Raj Subject: [PATCH 2/2] gcc: Drop reverting __getauxval patch Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 10:30:10 -0700 Message-Id: <20200514173010.3407-2-raj.khem@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.2 In-Reply-To: <20200514173010.3407-1-raj.khem@gmail.com> References: <20200514173010.3407-1-raj.khem@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Issue has been fixed in valgrind itself Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1.inc | 3 +- ...se-__getauxval-instead-of-getauxval-.patch | 47 ------------------- ...mic-Do-not-enforce-march-on-aarch64.patch} | 2 +- 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1/0038-Revert-AArch64-Use-__getauxval-instead-of-getauxval-.patch rename meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1/{0039-libatomic-Do-not-enforce-march-on-aarch64.patch => 0038-libatomic-Do-not-enforce-march-on-aarch64.patch} (96%) diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1.inc b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1.inc index 82b5a20a42..041d426187 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1.inc +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1.inc @@ -65,8 +65,7 @@ SRC_URI = "\ file://0035-gentypes-genmodes-Do-not-use-__LINE__-for-maintainin.patch \ file://0036-Enable-CET-in-cross-compiler-if-possible.patch \ file://0037-mingw32-Enable-operation_not_supported.patch \ - file://0038-Revert-AArch64-Use-__getauxval-instead-of-getauxval-.patch \ - file://0039-libatomic-Do-not-enforce-march-on-aarch64.patch \ + file://0038-libatomic-Do-not-enforce-march-on-aarch64.patch \ " SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "b6898a23844b656f1b68691c5c012036c2e694ac4b53a8918d4712ad876e7ea2" diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1/0038-Revert-AArch64-Use-__getauxval-instead-of-getauxval-.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1/0038-Revert-AArch64-Use-__getauxval-instead-of-getauxval-.patch deleted file mode 100644 index fc9228277a..0000000000 --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1/0038-Revert-AArch64-Use-__getauxval-instead-of-getauxval-.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,47 +0,0 @@ -From 2101fb718935c7cf1cc2ad201bdeb1e635b54b0a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Khem Raj -Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 11:03:41 -0700 -Subject: [PATCH] Revert "[AArch64] Use __getauxval instead of getauxval in LSE - detection code in libgcc" - -This reverts commit 5a57016dd2758cc63a544f191f77635342397a72. - -Upstream-Status: Pending -Signed-off-by: Khem Raj ---- - libgcc/config/aarch64/lse-init.c | 17 ++++++++--------- - 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) - -diff --git a/libgcc/config/aarch64/lse-init.c b/libgcc/config/aarch64/lse-init.c -index 00e9ab8cd1c..74acef25cce 100644 ---- a/libgcc/config/aarch64/lse-init.c -+++ b/libgcc/config/aarch64/lse-init.c -@@ -29,20 +29,19 @@ see the files COPYING3 and COPYING.RUNTIME respectively. If not, see - _Bool __aarch64_have_lse_atomics - __attribute__((visibility("hidden"), nocommon)); - --/* Gate availability of __getauxval on glibc. All AArch64-supporting glibc -- versions support it. */ --#ifdef __gnu_linux__ -+/* Disable initialization of __aarch64_have_lse_atomics during bootstrap. */ -+#if !defined(inhibit_libc) && defined(HAVE_SYS_AUXV_H) -+# include - --# define AT_HWCAP 16 --# define HWCAP_ATOMICS (1 << 8) -- --unsigned long int __getauxval (unsigned long int); -+/* Disable initialization if the system headers are too old. */ -+# if defined(AT_HWCAP) && defined(HWCAP_ATOMICS) - - static void __attribute__((constructor)) - init_have_lse_atomics (void) - { -- unsigned long hwcap = __getauxval (AT_HWCAP); -+ unsigned long hwcap = getauxval (AT_HWCAP); - __aarch64_have_lse_atomics = (hwcap & HWCAP_ATOMICS) != 0; - } - --#endif /* __gnu_linux__ */ -+# endif /* HWCAP */ -+#endif /* inhibit_libc */ diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1/0039-libatomic-Do-not-enforce-march-on-aarch64.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1/0038-libatomic-Do-not-enforce-march-on-aarch64.patch similarity index 96% rename from meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1/0039-libatomic-Do-not-enforce-march-on-aarch64.patch rename to meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1/0038-libatomic-Do-not-enforce-march-on-aarch64.patch index fecb562f51..3946acea11 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1/0039-libatomic-Do-not-enforce-march-on-aarch64.patch +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1/0038-libatomic-Do-not-enforce-march-on-aarch64.patch @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -From 411fc85c14bb14b07c0db807c55d25ce3f3e507f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From 38d262bfe7c0c894c364dc6e4dc7971e78a73974 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Khem Raj Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 15:10:38 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] libatomic: Do not enforce march on aarch64 -- 2.26.2