From: "Adrian Bunk" <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Steve Sakoman <sakoman@gmail.com>
Cc: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>,
Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org>,
Joshua Watt <jpewhacker@gmail.com>,
Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>,
jdmason@kudzu.us, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [OE-core][PATCH 0/4] Import recipes from meta-python
Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 20:47:02 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200516174702.GA22042@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGDS+n=_mqZeLFusTNV6s7EKNBDVdM589wAmcJ5qQH2BMn=MLw@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 03:21:57PM -1000, Steve Sakoman wrote:
>
> I'm seeing a few votes of "yes for dunfell" and no opposition as yet
> (at least here on the list).
>
> I support the desire to get rid of a meta-python dependency in bsp
> layers so I'm also a yes vote unless someone comes up with a good
> reason why we shouldn't.
meta-openembedded/meta-python has a higher layer priority than OE-core.
Adding higher upstream versions of these recipes to a lower-priority
layer in a stable series is a potential source for weird problems.
> Steve
cu
Adrian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-16 17:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-14 21:04 [OE-core][PATCH 0/4] Import recipes from meta-python Joshua Watt
2020-05-14 21:04 ` [OE-core][PATCH 1/4] pycryptodome: Import " Joshua Watt
2020-05-14 21:04 ` [OE-core][PATCH 2/4] pyelftools: " Joshua Watt
2020-05-14 21:04 ` [OE-core][PATCH 3/4] python3-pycryptodome(x): Upgrade 3.9.4 -> 3.9.7 Joshua Watt
2020-05-14 21:04 ` [OE-core][PATCH 4/4] python3-pyelftools: Upgrade 0.25 -> 0.26 Joshua Watt
2020-05-15 18:53 ` [OE-core][PATCH 0/4] Import recipes from meta-python Denys Dmytriyenko
2020-05-15 19:05 ` Richard Purdie
2020-05-15 19:12 ` Joshua Watt
2020-05-15 19:26 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2020-05-15 19:56 ` Andrey Zhizhikin
2020-05-15 19:32 ` Khem Raj
2020-05-17 1:05 ` Alejandro Hernandez
2020-05-16 1:21 ` Steve Sakoman
2020-05-16 17:47 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2020-05-16 19:54 ` Peter Kjellerstedt
2020-05-16 20:09 ` Adrian Bunk
2020-05-16 20:24 ` Andrey Zhizhikin
2020-05-16 23:15 ` Andre McCurdy
2020-05-17 13:22 ` Adrian Bunk
2020-05-17 13:56 ` Martin Jansa
2020-05-17 15:45 ` Adrian Bunk
2020-05-17 16:00 ` Martin Jansa
2020-05-17 16:14 ` Adrian Bunk
2020-05-17 23:47 ` Khem Raj
2020-05-19 18:20 ` Steve Sakoman
2020-05-19 18:24 ` Martin Jansa
2020-05-19 19:57 ` Andre McCurdy
2020-05-21 9:11 ` Martin Jansa
2020-05-17 23:45 ` Khem Raj
2020-05-17 23:41 ` Khem Raj
2020-05-18 6:41 ` Alejandro Hernandez
2020-05-17 23:38 ` Khem Raj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200516174702.GA22042@localhost \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=denis@denix.org \
--cc=jdmason@kudzu.us \
--cc=jpewhacker@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=raj.khem@gmail.com \
--cc=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=sakoman@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox