From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay.dream-property.net (relay.dream-property.net [178.19.67.222]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web11.4229.1591126997453056707 for ; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 12:43:18 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=fail, err=bad algorithm. Only rsa-sha1 or rsa-sha256 are permitted; spf=pass (domain: opendreambox.org, ip: 178.19.67.222, mailfrom: obi@opendreambox.org) Received: from mail.dream-property.net (mail.dream-property.net [82.149.226.172]) by relay.dream-property.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EC30100944D6; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 19:43:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (ip-176-199-141-47.hsi06.unitymediagroup.de [176.199.141.47]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.dream-property.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0E0DB3142F9D; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 21:43:07 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=opendreambox.org; s=dkim; t=1591126988; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=70w50RMUY4j4HVyheyoXBQTk4mCi0cJzu07v5bmbsTM=; b=ihbGwqazZj3dKRG4eehZm50DNGIBAczVYY2Dq/MGFGx6EuR/I1GmdPq/3XXONg5sDyWs1A xa6jnu4fzSHIQdDw== Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 21:43:05 +0200 From: "Andreas Oberritter" To: "Gregor Zatko" Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] update-alternatives: introduce new package as a opkg-utils spin-off Message-ID: <20200602214305.6a3500f2@opendreambox.org> In-Reply-To: <20200602190925.384853-1-gzatko@gmail.com> References: <20200602190925.384853-1-gzatko@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Gregor, On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 21:09:25 +0200 "Gregor Zatko" wrote: > In some cases there is a need for update-alternatives script which gets built > within opkg-utils recipe into a standalone package. However, this causes to > many unnecessary dependencies, including Python, bc, OpenSSL etc. to be built. > > In this commit a standalone lightweight recipe for update-alternatives that > shouldn't be dependent on nothing other than bash. > > https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8879 > > Signed-off-by: Gregor Zatko > --- > .../conf/distro/include/default-providers.inc | 6 +-- > meta/conf/layer.conf | 3 +- > .../packagegroups/packagegroup-self-hosted.bb | 1 + > .../opkg-utils/opkg-utils_0.4.2.bb | 25 +--------- > .../update-alternatives_0.4.2.bb | 49 +++++++++++++++++++ why did you change the name from update-alternatives-opkg to update-alternatives? I would prefer to keep the suffix in order to be able to distinguish it more easily from other implementations, e.g. dpkg's. Best regards, Andreas