From: "Joshua Watt" <JPEWhacker@gmail.com>
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Cc: Joshua Watt <JPEWhacker@gmail.com>
Subject: [OE-core][PATCH v3 7/8] bitbake: tests: Add tests for BBMASK in multiconfig
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 21:54:04 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200603025405.26885-8-JPEWhacker@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200603025405.26885-1-JPEWhacker@gmail.com>
Adds a test to validate that multiconfigs can independently mask off
recipes by setting BBMASK. See the test description for further
information about how the test works.
Signed-off-by: Joshua Watt <JPEWhacker@gmail.com>
---
.../lib/bb/tests/runqueue-tests/conf/bitbake.conf | 3 ++-
.../runqueue-tests/conf/multiconfig/mc1.conf | 1 +
.../runqueue-tests/conf/multiconfig/mc2.conf | 1 +
.../runqueue-tests/recipes/fails-mc/fails-mc1.bb | 5 +++++
.../runqueue-tests/recipes/fails-mc/fails-mc2.bb | 4 ++++
bitbake/lib/bb/tests/runqueue.py | 15 +++++++++++++++
6 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 bitbake/lib/bb/tests/runqueue-tests/recipes/fails-mc/fails-mc1.bb
create mode 100644 bitbake/lib/bb/tests/runqueue-tests/recipes/fails-mc/fails-mc2.bb
diff --git a/bitbake/lib/bb/tests/runqueue-tests/conf/bitbake.conf b/bitbake/lib/bb/tests/runqueue-tests/conf/bitbake.conf
index 5e451fc2c0..efebf001a9 100644
--- a/bitbake/lib/bb/tests/runqueue-tests/conf/bitbake.conf
+++ b/bitbake/lib/bb/tests/runqueue-tests/conf/bitbake.conf
@@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
CACHE = "${TOPDIR}/cache"
THISDIR = "${@os.path.dirname(d.getVar('FILE'))}"
COREBASE := "${@os.path.normpath(os.path.dirname(d.getVar('FILE')+'/../../'))}"
-BBFILES = "${COREBASE}/recipes/*.bb"
+EXTRA_BBFILES ?= ""
+BBFILES = "${COREBASE}/recipes/*.bb ${EXTRA_BBFILES}"
PROVIDES = "${PN}"
PN = "${@bb.parse.vars_from_file(d.getVar('FILE', False),d)[0]}"
PF = "${BB_CURRENT_MC}:${PN}"
diff --git a/bitbake/lib/bb/tests/runqueue-tests/conf/multiconfig/mc1.conf b/bitbake/lib/bb/tests/runqueue-tests/conf/multiconfig/mc1.conf
index ecf23e1c73..f34b8dcccf 100644
--- a/bitbake/lib/bb/tests/runqueue-tests/conf/multiconfig/mc1.conf
+++ b/bitbake/lib/bb/tests/runqueue-tests/conf/multiconfig/mc1.conf
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
TMPDIR = "${TOPDIR}/mc1/"
+BBMASK += "recipes/fails-mc/fails-mc1.bb"
diff --git a/bitbake/lib/bb/tests/runqueue-tests/conf/multiconfig/mc2.conf b/bitbake/lib/bb/tests/runqueue-tests/conf/multiconfig/mc2.conf
index eef338e4cc..c3360fc5c8 100644
--- a/bitbake/lib/bb/tests/runqueue-tests/conf/multiconfig/mc2.conf
+++ b/bitbake/lib/bb/tests/runqueue-tests/conf/multiconfig/mc2.conf
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
TMPDIR = "${TOPDIR}/mc2/"
+BBMASK += "recipes/fails-mc/fails-mc2.bb"
diff --git a/bitbake/lib/bb/tests/runqueue-tests/recipes/fails-mc/fails-mc1.bb b/bitbake/lib/bb/tests/runqueue-tests/recipes/fails-mc/fails-mc1.bb
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..17a181fffb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/bitbake/lib/bb/tests/runqueue-tests/recipes/fails-mc/fails-mc1.bb
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+python () {
+ if d.getVar("BB_CURRENT_MC") == "mc1":
+ bb.fatal("Multiconfig is mc1")
+}
+
diff --git a/bitbake/lib/bb/tests/runqueue-tests/recipes/fails-mc/fails-mc2.bb b/bitbake/lib/bb/tests/runqueue-tests/recipes/fails-mc/fails-mc2.bb
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..cc69e7b82d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/bitbake/lib/bb/tests/runqueue-tests/recipes/fails-mc/fails-mc2.bb
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+python () {
+ if d.getVar("BB_CURRENT_MC") == "mc2":
+ bb.fatal("Multiconfig is mc2")
+}
diff --git a/bitbake/lib/bb/tests/runqueue.py b/bitbake/lib/bb/tests/runqueue.py
index 4ba12a0772..091b5e41e0 100644
--- a/bitbake/lib/bb/tests/runqueue.py
+++ b/bitbake/lib/bb/tests/runqueue.py
@@ -232,6 +232,21 @@ class RunQueueTests(unittest.TestCase):
expected.remove(x)
self.assertEqual(set(tasks), set(expected))
+ def test_multiconfig_bbmask(self):
+ # This test validates that multiconfigs can independently mask off
+ # recipes they do not want with BBMASK. It works by having recipes
+ # that will fail to parse for mc1 and mc2, then making each multiconfig
+ # build the one that does parse. This ensures that the recipes are in
+ # each multiconfigs BBFILES, but each is masking only the one that
+ # doesn't parse
+ with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory(prefix="runqueuetest") as tempdir:
+ extraenv = {
+ "BBMULTICONFIG" : "mc1 mc2",
+ "BB_SIGNATURE_HANDLER" : "basic",
+ "EXTRA_BBFILES": "${COREBASE}/recipes/fails-mc/*.bb",
+ }
+ cmd = ["bitbake", "mc:mc1:fails-mc2", "mc:mc2:fails-mc1"]
+ self.run_bitbakecmd(cmd, tempdir, "", extraenv=extraenv)
@unittest.skipIf(sys.version_info < (3, 5, 0), 'Python 3.5 or later required')
def test_hashserv_single(self):
--
2.26.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-03 2:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20200601202807.26357-1-JPEWhacker@gmail.com>
2020-06-03 2:53 ` [OE-core][PATCH v3 0/8] Add support for per-multiconfig BBMASK Joshua Watt
2020-06-03 2:53 ` [OE-core][PATCH v3 1/8] bitbake: cooker: Split file collections per multiconfig Joshua Watt
2020-06-03 2:53 ` [OE-core][PATCH v3 2/8] bitbake: cache: Use multiconfig aware caches Joshua Watt
2020-06-03 2:54 ` [OE-core][PATCH v3 3/8] bitbake: lib: Add support for Logging Adapters Joshua Watt
2020-06-03 2:54 ` [OE-core][PATCH v3 4/8] bitbake: lib: Add PrefixLoggerAdapter helper Joshua Watt
2020-06-04 21:00 ` Richard Purdie
2020-06-03 2:54 ` [OE-core][PATCH v3 5/8] bitbake: cache: Improve logging Joshua Watt
2020-06-03 2:54 ` [OE-core][PATCH v3 6/8] bitbake: cache: Cache size optimization Joshua Watt
2020-06-03 2:54 ` Joshua Watt [this message]
2020-06-03 2:54 ` [OE-core][PATCH v3 8/8] bitbake: command: Move split_mc_pn to runqueue Joshua Watt
2020-06-03 3:02 ` ✗ patchtest: failure for Add support for per-multiconfig BBMASK Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200603025405.26885-8-JPEWhacker@gmail.com \
--to=jpewhacker@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox