From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from esa9.hc324-48.eu.iphmx.com (esa9.hc324-48.eu.iphmx.com [207.54.69.27]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web08.28352.1604307675773949639 for ; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 01:01:17 -0800 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=fail reason="signature has expired" header.i=@bmw.de header.s=mailing1 header.b=RRwAurXL; spf=pass (domain: bmw.de, ip: 207.54.69.27, mailfrom: prvs=5683388e5=mikko.rapeli@bmw.de) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bmw.de; i=@bmw.de; q=dns/txt; s=mailing1; t=1604307675; x=1635843675; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=lvwASBTMQNT7trvv79ELEClg1fUh9PJYLkgBRrANMwg=; b=RRwAurXLzbCFc3bm2Fj+XW84xKTTMGRpWULuWMG7YPk0Pzv+RxgYC0LT VAd7l4cXWdkx22Ehr9pLUwMjJMrfFKuQwUrAY9HDEropnBCVd3L39kiA7 tS94Q89JSM1FcLXC1bJQ9OeLznhKMsFNkLLV5uRoaeK4A1w0sG6lC8Q2F Q=; Received: from esagw6.bmwgroup.com (HELO esagw6.muc) ([160.46.252.49]) by esa9.hc324-48.eu.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS; 02 Nov 2020 10:01:13 +0100 Received: from esabb4.muc ([160.50.100.33]) by esagw6.muc with ESMTP/TLS; 02 Nov 2020 10:01:13 +0100 Received: from smucm10m.bmwgroup.net (HELO smucm10m.europe.bmw.corp) ([160.48.96.49]) by esabb4.muc with ESMTP/TLS; 02 Nov 2020 10:01:04 +0100 Received: from smucm10k.europe.bmw.corp (160.48.96.47) by smucm10m.europe.bmw.corp (160.48.96.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 10:01:04 +0100 Received: from smucm10k.europe.bmw.corp ([160.48.96.47]) by smucm10k.europe.bmw.corp ([160.48.96.47]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.007; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 10:01:03 +0100 From: "Mikko Rapeli" To: CC: , , Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Example of how prebuilt binaries and locked sstate could work Thread-Topic: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Example of how prebuilt binaries and locked sstate could work Thread-Index: AQHWsE4XUleYl3qrgUepjT/rwe4Stam0e/4A Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2020 09:01:02 +0000 Message-ID: <20201102090100.GS1246345@korppu> References: <20201101125302.350160-1-richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20201101125302.350160-1-richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <86B491106F203047911F17735EBEA94B@bmwmail.corp> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Sun, Nov 01, 2020 at 12:53:00PM +0000, Richard Purdie wrote: > At the Yocto Project Summit, there was some talk about how prebuilt binar= ies could > be better supported. There was some discussion about how "locked sstate" = could=20 > actually handle this quite neatly. I thought I'd have a look at that and = came up=20 > with a few patches to illustrate what I was talking about. Interesting, thanks for bringing this up also on mailing list! How could one implement a variant where source recipe vs. pre-compiled binary build would be chosen based on access rights to a git tree in SRC_URI? Cheers, -Mikko=