From: Bhabu Bindu <bindudaniel1996@gmail.com>
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org, bhabu.bindu@kpit.com
Cc: ranjitsinh.rathod@kpit.com, Virendra Thakur <virendrak@kpit.com>
Subject: [OE-core][dunfell][PATCH] gcc: Fix inconsistent noexcept specifier for valarray in libstdc++
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2023 12:47:03 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230301071703.24640-1-bindudaniel1996@gmail.com> (raw)
From: Virendra Thakur <virendrak@kpit.com>
Backport of gcc upstream commit 2b2d97fc545635a0f6aa9c9ee3b017394bc494bf
to gcc release 9.5.0. This fix is available to all release-branches
except releases/gcc-9 because upstream do not support gcc-9 now.
Signed-off-by: Virendra Thakur <virendrak@kpit.com>
---
meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-9.5.inc | 1 +
...nsistent-noexcept-specific-for-valar.patch | 44 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 45 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-9.5/0002-libstdc-Fix-inconsistent-noexcept-specific-for-valar.patch
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-9.5.inc b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-9.5.inc
index 6a0a892b10..ec28246bf3 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-9.5.inc
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-9.5.inc
@@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ SRC_URI = "\
file://0037-CVE-2019-14250-Check-zero-value-in-simple_object_elf.patch \
file://0038-gentypes-genmodes-Do-not-use-__LINE__-for-maintainin.patch \
file://0039-process_alt_operands-Don-t-match-user-defined-regs-o.patch \
+ file://0002-libstdc-Fix-inconsistent-noexcept-specific-for-valar.patch \
"
S = "${TMPDIR}/work-shared/gcc-${PV}-${PR}/gcc-${PV}"
SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "27769f64ef1d4cd5e2be8682c0c93f9887983e6cfd1a927ce5a0a2915a95cf8f"
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-9.5/0002-libstdc-Fix-inconsistent-noexcept-specific-for-valar.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-9.5/0002-libstdc-Fix-inconsistent-noexcept-specific-for-valar.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..506064bfc2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-9.5/0002-libstdc-Fix-inconsistent-noexcept-specific-for-valar.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+From 60d966708d7cf105dccf128d2b7a38b0b2580a1a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
+Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2021 21:42:20 +0000
+Subject: [PATCH] libstdc++: Fix inconsistent noexcept-specific for valarray
+ begin/end
+
+These declarations should be noexcept after I added it to the
+definitions in <valarray>.
+
+libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
+
+ * include/bits/range_access.h (begin(valarray), end(valarray)):
+ Add noexcept.
+
+(cherry picked from commit 2b2d97fc545635a0f6aa9c9ee3b017394bc494bf)
+
+Upstream-Status: Backport [https://github.com/hkaelber/gcc/commit/2b2d97fc545635a0f6aa9c9ee3b017394bc494bf]
+Signed-off-by: Virendra Thakur <virendrak@kpit.com>
+
+---
+ libstdc++-v3/include/bits/range_access.h | 8 ++++----
+ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/range_access.h b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/range_access.h
+index 3d99ea92027..4736e75fda1 100644
+--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/range_access.h
++++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/range_access.h
+@@ -101,10 +101,10 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
+
+ template<typename _Tp> class valarray;
+ // These overloads must be declared for cbegin and cend to use them.
+- template<typename _Tp> _Tp* begin(valarray<_Tp>&);
+- template<typename _Tp> const _Tp* begin(const valarray<_Tp>&);
+- template<typename _Tp> _Tp* end(valarray<_Tp>&);
+- template<typename _Tp> const _Tp* end(const valarray<_Tp>&);
++ template<typename _Tp> _Tp* begin(valarray<_Tp>&) noexcept;
++ template<typename _Tp> const _Tp* begin(const valarray<_Tp>&) noexcept;
++ template<typename _Tp> _Tp* end(valarray<_Tp>&) noexcept;
++ template<typename _Tp> const _Tp* end(const valarray<_Tp>&) noexcept;
+
+ /**
+ * @brief Return an iterator pointing to the first element of
+--
+2.25.1
\ No newline at end of file
--
2.25.1
next reply other threads:[~2023-03-01 7:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-01 7:17 Bhabu Bindu [this message]
2023-03-01 8:09 ` [OE-core][dunfell][PATCH] gcc: Fix inconsistent noexcept specifier for valarray in libstdc++ Khem Raj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230301071703.24640-1-bindudaniel1996@gmail.com \
--to=bindudaniel1996@gmail.com \
--cc=bhabu.bindu@kpit.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=ranjitsinh.rathod@kpit.com \
--cc=virendrak@kpit.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox