Re: [OE-core][PATCH v6 00/12] Add SPDX 3.0 support

Joshua Watt
2024-07-15T20:41:23Z

On Sat, Jul 13, 2024 at 12:44 AM Richard Purdie
<richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2024-07-12 at 09:58 -0600, Joshua Watt via
> lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> > This patch series add support for SPDX 3.0 and sets it as the
> > default.
> > Currently it is not possible to have SPDX 2.2 and SPDX 3.0 enabled at
> > the same time
> >
> > v2: Added tests and addressed feedback
> > v3: Fixed several oe-selftest and build failures
> > v4: Fixed silly typo mistake in staging.bbclass
> > v5: Reworked to make SPDX 3 output reproducible by default. Variables
> > that introduce non-reproducible output are documented as such.
> > v6: Many changes:
> > * Fixed bug where building baremetal images would break SPDX 2.2
> > * Most SPDX code is now in python library files instead of tasks
> > * Removed dependency on pacakge_write_* tasks
> > * Fixed sstate selftest cases to account for SPDX 3.0 task names
>
> This had a lot of failures in testing I'm afraid:
>
> https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/83/builds/7134

This appears to be caused because the SPDX tasks are not running for
some recipes (e.g. automake). It looks like this like:

do_create_rootfs_spdx[recrdeptask] += "do_create_spdx do_create_package_spdx"

is not actually strong enough to make sure the SPDX tasks for automake
run for e.g. core-image-sato-sdk, but I don't know why. I'll keep
looking, but if anyone happens to know off the top of their head let
me know

>
> Cheers,
>
> Richard