public inbox for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@gmail.com>
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Cc: Alexander Kanavin <alex@linutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] recipeutils/get_recipe_upgrade_status: group recipes when they need to be upgraded together
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 20:22:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240717182216.1661015-3-alex.kanavin@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240717182216.1661015-1-alex.kanavin@gmail.com>

From: Alexander Kanavin <alex@linutronix.de>

This will allow 'lockstep upgrades' of such recipes, improving success
rates in automated version updating process.

devtool check-upgrade-status now prints:

These recipes need to be upgraded together {
glib-2.0                  2.80.2          2.80.4          Anuj Mittal <anuj.mittal@intel.com>
glib-2.0-initial          2.80.2          2.80.4          Anuj Mittal <anuj.mittal@intel.com>
}
These recipes need to be upgraded together {
util-linux                2.39.3          2.40.2          Chen Qi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com>
util-linux-libuuid        2.39.3          2.40.2          Chen Qi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com>
}
These recipes need to be upgraded together {
cmake                     3.29.3          3.30.0          Unassigned <unassigned@yoctoproject.org>
cmake-native              3.29.3          3.30.0          Unassigned <unassigned@yoctoproject.org>
}

etc.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alex@linutronix.de>
---
 meta/lib/oe/recipeutils.py                 | 23 +++++++++++++++++-
 meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/distrodata.py |  6 ++---
 scripts/lib/devtool/upgrade.py             | 28 +++++++++++++++-------
 3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/meta/lib/oe/recipeutils.py b/meta/lib/oe/recipeutils.py
index 7586332fe0c..56be75dc9c9 100644
--- a/meta/lib/oe/recipeutils.py
+++ b/meta/lib/oe/recipeutils.py
@@ -1154,6 +1154,7 @@ def get_recipe_upgrade_status(recipes=None):
         if not recipes:
             recipes = tinfoil.all_recipe_files(variants=False)
 
+        recipeincludes = {}
         for fn in recipes:
             try:
                 if fn.startswith("/"):
@@ -1178,11 +1179,13 @@ def get_recipe_upgrade_status(recipes=None):
 
             data_copy_list.append(data_copy)
 
+            recipeincludes[data.getVar('FILE')] = {'bbincluded':data.getVar('BBINCLUDED').split(),'pn':data.getVar('PN')}
+
     from concurrent.futures import ProcessPoolExecutor
     with ProcessPoolExecutor(max_workers=utils.cpu_count()) as executor:
         pkgs_list = executor.map(_get_recipe_upgrade_status, data_copy_list)
 
-    return pkgs_list
+    return _group_recipes(pkgs_list, _get_common_include_recipes(recipeincludes))
 
 def get_common_include_recipes():
     with bb.tinfoil.Tinfoil() as tinfoil:
@@ -1220,3 +1223,21 @@ def _get_common_include_recipes(recipeincludes_all):
                 recipes_with_shared_includes.append(recipeset)
 
         return recipes_with_shared_includes
+
+def _group_recipes(recipes, groups):
+    recipedict = {}
+    for r in recipes:
+        recipedict[r['pn']] = r
+
+    recipegroups = []
+    for g in groups:
+        recipeset = []
+        for r in g:
+            if r in recipedict.keys():
+                recipeset.append(recipedict[r])
+                del recipedict[r]
+        recipegroups.append(recipeset)
+
+    for r in recipedict.values():
+        recipegroups.append([r])
+    return recipegroups
diff --git a/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/distrodata.py b/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/distrodata.py
index bc561605220..bd375523649 100644
--- a/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/distrodata.py
+++ b/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/distrodata.py
@@ -20,10 +20,10 @@ class Distrodata(OESelftestTestCase):
         feature = 'LICENSE_FLAGS_ACCEPTED += " commercial"\n'
         self.write_config(feature)
 
-        pkgs = oe.recipeutils.get_recipe_upgrade_status()
+        pkggroups = oe.recipeutils.get_recipe_upgrade_status()
 
-        regressed_failures = [pkg['pn'] for pkg in pkgs if pkg['status'] == 'UNKNOWN_BROKEN']
-        regressed_successes = [pkg['pn'] for pkg in pkgs if pkg['status'] == 'KNOWN_BROKEN']
+        regressed_failures = [pkg['pn'] for pkgs in pkggroups for pkg in pkgs if pkg['status'] == 'UNKNOWN_BROKEN']
+        regressed_successes = [pkg['pn'] for pkgs in pkggroups for pkg in pkgs if pkg['status'] == 'KNOWN_BROKEN']
         msg = ""
         if len(regressed_failures) > 0:
             msg = msg + """
diff --git a/scripts/lib/devtool/upgrade.py b/scripts/lib/devtool/upgrade.py
index 10b4f8b5ee5..4c268af3a7c 100644
--- a/scripts/lib/devtool/upgrade.py
+++ b/scripts/lib/devtool/upgrade.py
@@ -654,18 +654,28 @@ def latest_version(args, config, basepath, workspace):
     return 0
 
 def check_upgrade_status(args, config, basepath, workspace):
+    def _print_status(recipe):
+        print("{:25} {:15} {:15} {} {} {}".format(   recipe['pn'],
+                                                               recipe['cur_ver'],
+                                                               recipe['status'] if recipe['status'] != 'UPDATE' else (recipe['next_ver'] if not recipe['next_ver'].endswith("new-commits-available") else "new commits"),
+                                                               recipe['maintainer'],
+                                                               recipe['revision'] if recipe['revision'] != 'N/A' else "",
+                                                               "cannot be updated due to: %s" %(recipe['no_upgrade_reason']) if recipe['no_upgrade_reason'] else ""))
     if not args.recipe:
         logger.info("Checking the upstream status for all recipes may take a few minutes")
     results = oe.recipeutils.get_recipe_upgrade_status(args.recipe)
-    for result in results:
-        # pn, update_status, current, latest, maintainer, latest_commit, no_update_reason
-        if args.all or result['status'] != 'MATCH':
-            print("{:25} {:15} {:15} {} {} {}".format(   result['pn'],
-                                                               result['cur_ver'],
-                                                               result['status'] if result['status'] != 'UPDATE' else (result['next_ver'] if not result['next_ver'].endswith("new-commits-available") else "new commits"),
-                                                               result['maintainer'],
-                                                               result['revision'] if result['revision'] != 'N/A' else "",
-                                                               "cannot be updated due to: %s" %(result['no_upgrade_reason']) if result['no_upgrade_reason'] else ""))
+    for recipegroup in results:
+        upgrades = [r for r in recipegroup if r['status'] != 'MATCH']
+        currents = [r for r in recipegroup if r['status'] == 'MATCH']
+        if len(upgrades) > 1:
+            print("These recipes need to be upgraded together {")
+        for r in upgrades:
+            _print_status(r)
+        if len(upgrades) > 1:
+            print("}")
+        for r in currents:
+            if args.all:
+                _print_status(r)
 
 def register_commands(subparsers, context):
     """Register devtool subcommands from this plugin"""
-- 
2.39.2



  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-07-17 18:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-17 18:22 [PATCH 1/4] lib/oe/recipeutils: return a dict in get_recipe_upgrade_status() instead of a tuple Alexander Kanavin
2024-07-17 18:22 ` [PATCH 2/4] lib/recipeutils: add a function to determine recipes with shared include files Alexander Kanavin
2024-07-22 14:43   ` [OE-core] " Richard Purdie
2024-07-23  7:15     ` Alexander Kanavin
2024-07-23  7:21       ` Richard Purdie
2024-07-23  7:27         ` Alexander Kanavin
2024-07-17 18:22 ` Alexander Kanavin [this message]
2024-07-17 18:38   ` Patchtest results for [PATCH 3/4] recipeutils/get_recipe_upgrade_status: group recipes when they need to be upgraded together patchtest
2024-07-17 18:22 ` [PATCH 4/4] devtool/upgrade: use PN instead of BPN for naming newly created upgraded recipes Alexander Kanavin
2024-07-17 18:38 ` Patchtest results for [PATCH 1/4] lib/oe/recipeutils: return a dict in get_recipe_upgrade_status() instead of a tuple patchtest

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240717182216.1661015-3-alex.kanavin@gmail.com \
    --to=alex.kanavin@gmail.com \
    --cc=alex@linutronix.de \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox