From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
To: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Hochstein <tom.hochstein@oss.nxp.com>,
openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] time64.inc: Simplify GLIBC_64BIT_TIME_FLAGS usage
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 23:20:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202407242120506c8cc0f9@mail.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANNYZj8s+PmYjrAEr=4gM1ZqO1enJ6t5eOdosCONKL175buSuA@mail.gmail.com>
On 24/07/2024 22:29:45+0200, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 at 21:33, Tom Hochstein <tom.hochstein@oss.nxp.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks, Alex.
> >
> > We are working to configure the builds of certain recipes so the non-Y2038-compliant code is avoided, e.g, by disabling oss-output in pulseaudio. That leads to needing to restore GLIBC_64BIT_TIME_FLAGS, which for pulseaudio is cleared in this file (on scarthgap, not on master):
> >
> > GLIBC_64BIT_TIME_FLAGS:pn-pulseaudio = ""
> >
> > When you do that override as one would normally expect, i.e., without the leading space, you get the error:
> >
> > cc1: error: '-Werror=format-security-D_TIME_BITS=64': no option '-Wformat-security-D_TIME_BITS=64'
> >
> > The problem is the design in time64.inc does impose an extra requirement for an external assignment to include a leading space. The redesign is meant to remove that requirement on the leading space, i.e., to simplify the usage of the variable by external users.
>
> Thanks for the background. I guess the only real objection I have is
> about repeating the flags multiple times. They should be defined once,
> so we probably need an extra intermediate variable that would be set
> with target overrides.
Then why not simply have this intermediate variable contain the initial
GLIBC_64BIT_TIME_FLAGS value with the leading space so recipe can simply
use it to restore the value?
--
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-24 21:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-24 17:08 [PATCH] time64.inc: Simplify GLIBC_64BIT_TIME_FLAGS usage Tom Hochstein
2024-07-24 17:20 ` [OE-core] " Alexander Kanavin
2024-07-24 19:31 ` Tom Hochstein
2024-07-24 19:33 ` Tom Hochstein
2024-07-24 20:29 ` Alexander Kanavin
2024-07-24 21:20 ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202407242120506c8cc0f9@mail.local \
--to=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=alex.kanavin@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=tom.hochstein@oss.nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox