public inbox for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Adriaan Schmidt" <adriaan.schmidt@siemens.com>
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Cc: richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org, ross.burton@arm.com,
	Adriaan Schmidt <adriaan.schmidt@siemens.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/1] libunwind: update 1.6.2 -> 1.8.1
Date: Thu,  3 Apr 2025 10:19:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250403081907.3422293-1-adriaan.schmidt@siemens.com> (raw)

Hi,

After a failed first try (sorry again for the confusion),
here is what actually works for me. The patch was taken from
https://git.yoctoproject.org/poky-contrib/log/?h=ross/libunwind,
but I removed the "apply=0" form the mips-byte-order.patch.

In summary: we have 5 backported patches, and one submitted but not yet merged.

Adriaan

Ross Burton (1):
  libunwind: 1.8.1

 ...-Gtrace-remove-unguarded-print-calls.patch |  52 ----
 ...t-sve-signal-check-that-SVE-is-prese.patch |  73 ++++++
 ...c-or-musl-register-names-as-appropr.patch} |  23 +-
 ...compilation-of-unw_getcontext-on-ARM.patch |  27 ++
 ...ork-inline-aarch64-as-for-setcontext.patch | 163 ++++++++++++
 .../libunwind/0005-Handle-musl-on-PPC32.patch |  88 +++++++
 ...context-mismatches-between-glibc-and.patch | 247 ------------------
 .../libunwind/libunwind/mips-byte-order.patch |   2 +-
 ...{libunwind_1.6.2.bb => libunwind_1.8.1.bb} |  25 +-
 9 files changed, 377 insertions(+), 323 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-support/libunwind/libunwind/0001-src-Gtrace-remove-unguarded-print-calls.patch
 create mode 100644 meta/recipes-support/libunwind/libunwind/0001-tests-Garm64-test-sve-signal-check-that-SVE-is-prese.patch
 rename meta/recipes-support/libunwind/libunwind/{mips-coredump-register.patch => 0002-coredump-use-glibc-or-musl-register-names-as-appropr.patch} (86%)
 create mode 100644 meta/recipes-support/libunwind/libunwind/0003-Fixed-miscompilation-of-unw_getcontext-on-ARM.patch
 create mode 100644 meta/recipes-support/libunwind/libunwind/0004-Rework-inline-aarch64-as-for-setcontext.patch
 create mode 100644 meta/recipes-support/libunwind/libunwind/0005-Handle-musl-on-PPC32.patch
 delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-support/libunwind/libunwind/0005-ppc32-Consider-ucontext-mismatches-between-glibc-and.patch
 rename meta/recipes-support/libunwind/{libunwind_1.6.2.bb => libunwind_1.8.1.bb} (57%)

-- 
2.39.2



             reply	other threads:[~2025-04-03 12:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-03  8:19 Adriaan Schmidt [this message]
2025-04-03  8:19 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] libunwind: 1.8.1 Adriaan Schmidt
2025-04-04  1:03   ` [OE-core] " Khem Raj
2025-04-10  9:43     ` Adriaan Schmidt
2025-04-10 11:46       ` Richard Purdie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250403081907.3422293-1-adriaan.schmidt@siemens.com \
    --to=adriaan.schmidt@siemens.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=ross.burton@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox