From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C994C5516D for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2026 05:34:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.msgproc01-g2.32609.1771565686307896284 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2026 21:34:47 -0800 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=fail reason="dkim: message contains an insecure body length tag" header.i=@cisco.com header.s=iport01 header.b=HMl12DwL; spf=pass (domain: cisco.com, ip: 173.37.142.89, mailfrom: hetpat@cisco.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2360; q=dns/txt; s=iport01; t=1771565687; x=1772775287; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qQF7MV+QFxdCrzr3V3Nq1N46pCFkwHT60VjzoMRzcEI=; b=HMl12DwLh9mAGz/nR2Z+9ihoJSWxHLQWFmAQLLMps8MOldffook13i2/ ESnNRiZ73AAghLxHJeeRswC2PdjUzUn9Dcn3y5aYbIK2U0/8I7zXP4ni4 t4a8I26xxy1BHNC2tqUrMbEpXdKJBqu5vjrnd2LzeI2WA29WgDWFft0MZ w5+CFoashRPtjjrWfO74inxBKJf0GUr8pRmhwx4lYMbAe5qzlijpLcHpR JRWbx2LOxQ+iX8CyZhtE62isclf3S6r34YM0S4K/HanpK9BGQJcTJRgGf 8PbGlSw1Fig67LPZMzjrzxlNpJvSv1/Euf5Q2ovIjru8MTjvOBSgVkq5p w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: fkaRtDUeTCK2aSUCLp0gKA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: C6nkBhKsSOmAOHHJVAh/3Q== X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0A/BAC68Zdp/4//Ja1aglmCGDAPgVBCSZZLA54agX8PA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBD1EEAQGFBwKNHwImNAkOAQIEAQEBAQMCAwEBAQEBAQEBAQEBCwEBBQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QIBBwWBDhOGXIZbAgEDMgFGECAxKysZgwKCdAIBp0+CLIEBhHzbJgELFAGBO?= =?us-ascii?q?IU8iBlaGoR6JxsbgXKEfYUQhXcEgiKBDpNPSIEeA1ksAVUTDQoLBwWBZgM1E?= =?us-ascii?q?ioVbjIdgSM+F4ELGwcFh1MPiQV4boEggRsDCxgNSBEsNxQbBD5uB44vP4IzA?= =?us-ascii?q?QGBDTCCO6VhoQ4KKIN0oVgaM4QEpmeZBoJYoUo3hGiBaDyBWXAVgyJSGQ+PV?= =?us-ascii?q?QEHvTwiNTwCBwsBAQMJk2cBAQ?= IronPort-Data: A9a23:0pMR9qLSlFZFOo4DFE+RhpQlxSXFcZb7ZxGr2PjKsXjdYENS3jcBy TcaWWmHM/qDNGqhLosjYYS0pBtXvpLcz4VrSwUd+CA2RRqmiyZq6fd1j6vUF3nPRiEWZBs/t 63yUvGZcoZsCCSa/kvxWlTYhSEU/bmSQbbhA/LzNCl0RAt1IA8skhsLd9QR2uaEuvDnRVnU0 T/Oi5eHYgH9gWQsajl8B5+r8XuDgtyj4Fv0gXRmDRx7lAe2v2UYCpsZOZawIxPQKqFIHvS3T vr017qw+GXU5X8FUrtJRZ6iLyXm6paLVeS/oiI+t5qK23CulQRuukoPD8fwXG8M49m/c3+d/ /0W3XC4YV9B0qQhA43xWTEAe811FfUuFLMqvRFTvOTLp3AqfUcAzN1gD0gMIaEl99pcIjtHz sEzDChVYTOq0rfeLLKTEoGAh+w5J8XteYdasXZ6wHSBU7AtQIvIROPB4towMDUY358VW62BI ZBENHw2ME+ojx5nYj/7DLo+kfuwj2XXeDxDo1XTrq0yi4TW5FIvgOK2bYqLJrRmQ+1+wECbj GLl5F/eBzg9FPy99xOFtSmV07qncSTTHdh6+KeD3vlyjVuew2YeBBEbWR6wpuO0okq/QM5Eb UsM9ywjqKI/+ECmQp/6RRLQnZKflgQXV9wVF6gx7xuAj/KKpQ2YHWMDCDVGbbTKqfMLeNDj7 XfR9/uBONClmOf9pa61nltMkQ6PBA== IronPort-HdrOrdr: A9a23:Ic13I6P+pHoGacBcTsajsMiBIKoaSvp037Dk7S9MoHtuA6ulfq +V/cjzuSWYtN9VYgBDpTniAtjlfZqjz/5ICOAqVN/INjUO+lHYSb2KhrGN/9SPIUHDH5ZmpM Rdm2wUMqyIMbC85vyKhjWFLw== X-Talos-CUID: 9a23:xSZIdm2U48vi8oWvfM8dvbxfFMMsSGHx8XrsCGziAF1UY5mNEVCz0fYx X-Talos-MUID: 9a23:2HiAoQbenfKgY+BTnGHqhxtiF9xTxKGHL2Ats6svu47fDHkl X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,301,1763424000"; d="scan'208";a="668235864" Received: from rcdn-l-core-06.cisco.com ([173.37.255.143]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384; 20 Feb 2026 05:34:46 +0000 Received: from sjc-ads-8556.cisco.com (sjc-ads-8556.cisco.com [171.68.222.95]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by rcdn-l-core-06.cisco.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 894A618000246; Fri, 20 Feb 2026 05:34:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: by sjc-ads-8556.cisco.com (Postfix, from userid 1847788) id B8E96CC8D06; Thu, 19 Feb 2026 21:34:44 -0800 (PST) From: "Het Patel -X (hetpat - E INFOCHIPS PRIVATE LIMITED at Cisco)" To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Cc: xe-linux-external@cisco.com, vchavda@cisco.com Subject: [openembedded-core] [scarthgap] [PATCH v1 21/34] cve-check: fix debug message Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2026 21:34:30 -0800 Message-Id: <20260220053443.3006180-21-hetpat@cisco.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.35.6 In-Reply-To: <20260220053443.3006180-1-hetpat@cisco.com> References: <20260220053443.3006180-1-hetpat@cisco.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 171.68.222.95, sjc-ads-8556.cisco.com X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-l-core-06.cisco.com List-Id: X-Webhook-Received: from 45-33-107-173.ip.linodeusercontent.com [45.33.107.173] by aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org with HTTPS for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2026 05:34:50 -0000 X-Groupsio-URL: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/231485 From: Daniel Turull Debug level was not added as a parameter, causing a warning. Signed-off-by: Daniel Turull Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie (cherry picked from commit 40157fcbd9066f261812ba665ec963b2e496aa53) Signed-off-by: Het Patel --- meta/classes/cve-check.bbclass | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/classes/cve-check.bbclass b/meta/classes/cve-check.bbclass index 3555a74c42..1641ed4aff 100644 --- a/meta/classes/cve-check.bbclass +++ b/meta/classes/cve-check.bbclass @@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ def cve_update(d, cve_data, cve, entry): cve_data[cve] = entry return # If we are updating, there might be change in the status - bb.debug("Trying CVE entry update for %s from %s to %s" % (cve, cve_data[cve]['abbrev-status'], entry['abbrev-status'])) + bb.debug(1, "Trying CVE entry update for %s from %s to %s" % (cve, cve_data[cve]['abbrev-status'], entry['abbrev-status'])) if cve_data[cve]['abbrev-status'] == "Unknown": cve_data[cve] = entry return @@ -290,16 +290,16 @@ def cve_update(d, cve_data, cve, entry): if entry['status'] == "version-in-range" and cve_data[cve]['status'] == "version-not-in-range": # New result from the scan, vulnerable cve_data[cve] = entry - bb.debug("CVE entry %s update from Patched to Unpatched from the scan result" % cve) + bb.debug(1, "CVE entry %s update from Patched to Unpatched from the scan result" % cve) return if entry['abbrev-status'] == "Patched" and cve_data[cve]['abbrev-status'] == "Unpatched": if entry['status'] == "version-not-in-range" and cve_data[cve]['status'] == "version-in-range": # Range does not match the scan, but we already have a vulnerable match, ignore - bb.debug("CVE entry %s update from Patched to Unpatched from the scan result - not applying" % cve) + bb.debug(1, "CVE entry %s update from Patched to Unpatched from the scan result - not applying" % cve) return # If we have an "Ignored", it has a priority if cve_data[cve]['abbrev-status'] == "Ignored": - bb.debug("CVE %s not updating because Ignored" % cve) + bb.debug(1, "CVE %s not updating because Ignored" % cve) return bb.warn("Unhandled CVE entry update for %s from %s to %s" % (cve, cve_data[cve], entry))