public inbox for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Deepak Rathore -X (deeratho - E INFOCHIPS PRIVATE LIMITED at Cisco)" <deeratho@cisco.com>
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: [OE-core][whinlatter][PATCH v2 1/4] binutils: Fix CVE-2025-69648
Date: Wed,  1 Apr 2026 03:00:22 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260401100022.1173083-1-deeratho@cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260317041229.2932275-1-deeratho@cisco.com>

From: Deepak Rathore <deeratho@cisco.com>

pick the patch [1] as mentioned in [2]

[1] https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=598704a00cbac5e85c2bedd363357b5bf6fcee33
[2] https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-69648

Signed-off-by: Deepak Rathore <deeratho@cisco.com>

diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/0001-pick-the-patch-1-as-mentioned-in-2.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/0001-pick-the-patch-1-as-mentioned-in-2.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..70866fd7da
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/0001-pick-the-patch-1-as-mentioned-in-2.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,222 @@
+From 507f05eb8f3a132a536c593e232fdc7878fb9bba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Deepak Rathore <deeratho@cisco.com>
+Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 11:25:32 +0000
+Subject: [PATCH] pick the patch [1] as mentioned in [2].
+
+[1] https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=598704a00cbac5e85c2bedd363357b5bf6fcee33
+[2] https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-69648
+
+Signed-off-by: Deepak Rathore <deeratho@cisco.com>
+---
+ .../binutils/binutils-2.45.inc                |   1 +
+ .../binutils/binutils/CVE-2025-69648.patch    | 188 ++++++++++++++++++
+ 2 files changed, 189 insertions(+)
+ create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/CVE-2025-69648.patch
+
+diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.45.inc b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.45.inc
+index 16a63cabc5..b6d7b3d60f 100644
+--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.45.inc
++++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.45.inc
+@@ -46,4 +46,5 @@ SRC_URI = "\
+      file://0018-CVE-2025-11494.patch \
+      file://0019-CVE-2025-11839.patch \
+      file://0020-CVE-2025-11840.patch \
++     file://CVE-2025-69648.patch \
+ "
+diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/CVE-2025-69648.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/CVE-2025-69648.patch
+new file mode 100644
+index 0000000000..2346b18f01
+--- /dev/null
++++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/CVE-2025-69648.patch
+@@ -0,0 +1,188 @@
++From 7df481dd76c05c89782721e9df5468be829c356b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
++From: Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
++Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2025 09:22:10 +1030
++Subject: [PATCH] PR 33638, debug_rnglists output
++
++The fuzzed testcase in this PR continuously outputs an error about
++the debug_rnglists header.  Fixed by taking notice of the error and
++stopping output.  The patch also limits the length in all cases, not
++just when a relocation is present, and limits the offset entry count
++read from the header.  I removed the warning and the test for relocs
++because the code can't work reliably with unresolved relocs in the
++length field.
++
++	PR 33638
++	* dwarf.c (display_debug_rnglists_list): Return bool.  Rename
++	"inital_length" to plain "length".  Verify length is large
++	enough to read header.  Limit length to rest of section.
++	Similarly limit offset_entry_count.
++	(display_debug_ranges): Check display_debug_rnglists_unit_header
++	return status.  Stop output on error.
++
++CVE: CVE-2025-69648
++Upstream-Status: Backport [https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=598704a00cbac5e85c2bedd363357b5bf6fcee33]
++
++(cherry picked from commit 598704a00cbac5e85c2bedd363357b5bf6fcee33)
++Signed-off-by: Deepak Rathore <deeratho@cisco.com>
++---
++ binutils/dwarf.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
++ 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
++
++diff --git a/binutils/dwarf.c b/binutils/dwarf.c
++index f4bcb677761..b4fb56351ec 100644
++--- a/binutils/dwarf.c
+++++ b/binutils/dwarf.c
++@@ -8282,7 +8282,7 @@ display_debug_rnglists_list (unsigned char * start,
++   return start;
++ }
++
++-static int
+++static bool
++ display_debug_rnglists_unit_header (struct dwarf_section *  section,
++				    uint64_t *              unit_offset,
++				    unsigned char *         poffset_size)
++@@ -8290,7 +8290,8 @@ display_debug_rnglists_unit_header (struct dwarf_section *  section,
++   uint64_t        start_offset = *unit_offset;
++   unsigned char * p = section->start + start_offset;
++   unsigned char * finish = section->start + section->size;
++-  uint64_t        initial_length;
+++  unsigned char * hdr;
+++  uint64_t        length;
++   unsigned char   segment_selector_size;
++   unsigned int    offset_entry_count;
++   unsigned int    i;
++@@ -8299,66 +8300,59 @@ display_debug_rnglists_unit_header (struct dwarf_section *  section,
++   unsigned char   offset_size;
++
++   /* Get and check the length of the block.  */
++-  SAFE_BYTE_GET_AND_INC (initial_length, p, 4, finish);
+++  SAFE_BYTE_GET_AND_INC (length, p, 4, finish);
++
++-  if (initial_length == 0xffffffff)
+++  if (length == 0xffffffff)
++     {
++       /* This section is 64-bit DWARF 3.  */
++-      SAFE_BYTE_GET_AND_INC (initial_length, p, 8, finish);
+++      SAFE_BYTE_GET_AND_INC (length, p, 8, finish);
++       *poffset_size = offset_size = 8;
++     }
++   else
++     *poffset_size = offset_size = 4;
++
++-  if (initial_length > (size_t) (finish - p))
++-    {
++-      /* If the length field has a relocation against it, then we should
++-	 not complain if it is inaccurate (and probably negative).
++-	 It is copied from .debug_line handling code.  */
++-      if (reloc_at (section, (p - section->start) - offset_size))
++-	initial_length = finish - p;
++-      else
++-	{
++-	  warn (_("The length field (%#" PRIx64
++-		  ") in the debug_rnglists header is wrong"
++-		  " - the section is too small\n"),
++-		initial_length);
++-	  return 0;
++-	}
++-    }
++-
++-  /* Report the next unit offset to the caller.  */
++-  *unit_offset = (p - section->start) + initial_length;
+++  if (length < 8)
+++    return false;
++
++   /* Get the other fields in the header.  */
+++  hdr = p;
++   SAFE_BYTE_GET_AND_INC (version, p, 2, finish);
++   SAFE_BYTE_GET_AND_INC (address_size, p, 1, finish);
++   SAFE_BYTE_GET_AND_INC (segment_selector_size, p, 1, finish);
++   SAFE_BYTE_GET_AND_INC (offset_entry_count, p, 4, finish);
++
++   printf (_(" Table at Offset: %#" PRIx64 ":\n"), start_offset);
++-  printf (_("  Length:          %#" PRIx64 "\n"), initial_length);
+++  printf (_("  Length:          %#" PRIx64 "\n"), length);
++   printf (_("  DWARF version:   %u\n"), version);
++   printf (_("  Address size:    %u\n"), address_size);
++   printf (_("  Segment size:    %u\n"), segment_selector_size);
++   printf (_("  Offset entries:  %u\n"), offset_entry_count);
++
+++  if (length > (size_t) (finish - hdr))
+++    length = finish - hdr;
+++
+++  /* Report the next unit offset to the caller.  */
+++  *unit_offset = (hdr - section->start) + length;
+++
++   /* Check the fields.  */
++   if (segment_selector_size != 0)
++     {
++       warn (_("The %s section contains "
++	      "unsupported segment selector size: %d.\n"),
++	    section->name, segment_selector_size);
++-      return 0;
+++      return false;
++     }
++
++   if (version < 5)
++     {
++       warn (_("Only DWARF version 5+ debug_rnglists info "
++	      "is currently supported.\n"));
++-      return 0;
+++      return false;
++     }
++
+++  uint64_t max_off_count = (length - 8) / offset_size;
+++  if (offset_entry_count > max_off_count)
+++    offset_entry_count = max_off_count;
++   if (offset_entry_count != 0)
++     {
++       printf (_("\n   Offsets starting at %#tx:\n"), p - section->start);
++@@ -8372,7 +8366,7 @@ display_debug_rnglists_unit_header (struct dwarf_section *  section,
++	}
++     }
++
++-  return 1;
+++  return true;
++ }
++
++ static bool
++@@ -8404,6 +8398,7 @@ display_debug_ranges (struct dwarf_section *section,
++   uint64_t last_offset = 0;
++   uint64_t next_rnglists_cu_offset = 0;
++   unsigned char offset_size;
+++  bool ok_header = true;
++
++   if (bytes == 0)
++     {
++@@ -8493,8 +8488,12 @@ display_debug_ranges (struct dwarf_section *section,
++       /* If we've moved on to the next compile unit in the rnglists section - dump the unit header(s).  */
++       if (is_rnglists && next_rnglists_cu_offset < offset)
++	{
++-	  while (next_rnglists_cu_offset < offset)
++-	    display_debug_rnglists_unit_header (section, &next_rnglists_cu_offset, &offset_size);
+++	  while (ok_header && next_rnglists_cu_offset < offset)
+++	    ok_header = display_debug_rnglists_unit_header (section,
+++							    &next_rnglists_cu_offset,
+++							    &offset_size);
+++	  if (!ok_header)
+++	    break;
++	  printf (_("    Offset   Begin    End\n"));
++	}
++
++@@ -8548,10 +8547,12 @@ display_debug_ranges (struct dwarf_section *section,
++     }
++
++   /* Display trailing empty (or unreferenced) compile units, if any.  */
++-  if (is_rnglists)
+++  if (is_rnglists && ok_header)
++     while (next_rnglists_cu_offset < section->size)
++-      display_debug_rnglists_unit_header (section, &next_rnglists_cu_offset, &offset_size);
++-
+++      if (!display_debug_rnglists_unit_header (section,
+++					       &next_rnglists_cu_offset,
+++					       &offset_size))
+++	break;
++   putchar ('\n');
++
++   free (range_entries);
++--
++2.35.6
+-- 
+2.51.0
+
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.45.inc b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.45.inc
index 16a63cabc5..b6d7b3d60f 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.45.inc
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.45.inc
@@ -46,4 +46,5 @@ SRC_URI = "\
      file://0018-CVE-2025-11494.patch \
      file://0019-CVE-2025-11839.patch \
      file://0020-CVE-2025-11840.patch \
+     file://CVE-2025-69648.patch \
 "
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/CVE-2025-69648.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/CVE-2025-69648.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..ce0e764762
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/CVE-2025-69648.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,189 @@
+From 7df481dd76c05c89782721e9df5468be829c356b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
+Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2025 09:22:10 +1030
+Subject: [PATCH] PR 33638, debug_rnglists output
+
+The fuzzed testcase in this PR continuously outputs an error about
+the debug_rnglists header.  Fixed by taking notice of the error and
+stopping output.  The patch also limits the length in all cases, not
+just when a relocation is present, and limits the offset entry count
+read from the header.  I removed the warning and the test for relocs
+because the code can't work reliably with unresolved relocs in the
+length field.
+
+	PR 33638
+	* dwarf.c (display_debug_rnglists_list): Return bool.  Rename
+	"inital_length" to plain "length".  Verify length is large
+	enough to read header.  Limit length to rest of section.
+	Similarly limit offset_entry_count.
+	(display_debug_ranges): Check display_debug_rnglists_unit_header
+	return status.  Stop output on error.
+
+CVE: CVE-2025-69648
+Upstream-Status: Backport [https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=598704a00cbac5e85c2bedd363357b5bf6fcee33]
+
+(cherry picked from commit 598704a00cbac5e85c2bedd363357b5bf6fcee33)
+Signed-off-by: Deepak Rathore <deeratho@cisco.com>
+---
+ binutils/dwarf.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
+ 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/binutils/dwarf.c b/binutils/dwarf.c
+index f4bcb677761..b4fb56351ec 100644
+--- a/binutils/dwarf.c
++++ b/binutils/dwarf.c
+@@ -8282,7 +8282,7 @@ display_debug_rnglists_list (unsigned char * start,
+   return start;
+ }
+ 
+-static int
++static bool
+ display_debug_rnglists_unit_header (struct dwarf_section *  section,
+ 				    uint64_t *              unit_offset,
+ 				    unsigned char *         poffset_size)
+@@ -8290,7 +8290,8 @@ display_debug_rnglists_unit_header (struct dwarf_section *  section,
+   uint64_t        start_offset = *unit_offset;
+   unsigned char * p = section->start + start_offset;
+   unsigned char * finish = section->start + section->size;
+-  uint64_t        initial_length;
++  unsigned char * hdr;
++  uint64_t        length;
+   unsigned char   segment_selector_size;
+   unsigned int    offset_entry_count;
+   unsigned int    i;
+@@ -8299,66 +8300,59 @@ display_debug_rnglists_unit_header (struct dwarf_section *  section,
+   unsigned char   offset_size;
+ 
+   /* Get and check the length of the block.  */
+-  SAFE_BYTE_GET_AND_INC (initial_length, p, 4, finish);
++  SAFE_BYTE_GET_AND_INC (length, p, 4, finish);
+ 
+-  if (initial_length == 0xffffffff)
++  if (length == 0xffffffff)
+     {
+       /* This section is 64-bit DWARF 3.  */
+-      SAFE_BYTE_GET_AND_INC (initial_length, p, 8, finish);
++      SAFE_BYTE_GET_AND_INC (length, p, 8, finish);
+       *poffset_size = offset_size = 8;
+     }
+   else
+     *poffset_size = offset_size = 4;
+ 
+-  if (initial_length > (size_t) (finish - p))
+-    {
+-      /* If the length field has a relocation against it, then we should
+-	 not complain if it is inaccurate (and probably negative).
+-	 It is copied from .debug_line handling code.  */
+-      if (reloc_at (section, (p - section->start) - offset_size))
+-	initial_length = finish - p;
+-      else
+-	{
+-	  warn (_("The length field (%#" PRIx64
+-		  ") in the debug_rnglists header is wrong"
+-		  " - the section is too small\n"),
+-		initial_length);
+-	  return 0;
+-	}
+-    }
+-
+-  /* Report the next unit offset to the caller.  */
+-  *unit_offset = (p - section->start) + initial_length;
++  if (length < 8)
++    return false;
+ 
+   /* Get the other fields in the header.  */
++  hdr = p;
+   SAFE_BYTE_GET_AND_INC (version, p, 2, finish);
+   SAFE_BYTE_GET_AND_INC (address_size, p, 1, finish);
+   SAFE_BYTE_GET_AND_INC (segment_selector_size, p, 1, finish);
+   SAFE_BYTE_GET_AND_INC (offset_entry_count, p, 4, finish);
+ 
+   printf (_(" Table at Offset: %#" PRIx64 ":\n"), start_offset);
+-  printf (_("  Length:          %#" PRIx64 "\n"), initial_length);
++  printf (_("  Length:          %#" PRIx64 "\n"), length);
+   printf (_("  DWARF version:   %u\n"), version);
+   printf (_("  Address size:    %u\n"), address_size);
+   printf (_("  Segment size:    %u\n"), segment_selector_size);
+   printf (_("  Offset entries:  %u\n"), offset_entry_count);
+ 
++  if (length > (size_t) (finish - hdr))
++    length = finish - hdr;
++
++  /* Report the next unit offset to the caller.  */
++  *unit_offset = (hdr - section->start) + length;
++
+   /* Check the fields.  */
+   if (segment_selector_size != 0)
+     {
+       warn (_("The %s section contains "
+ 	      "unsupported segment selector size: %d.\n"),
+ 	    section->name, segment_selector_size);
+-      return 0;
++      return false;
+     }
+ 
+   if (version < 5)
+     {
+       warn (_("Only DWARF version 5+ debug_rnglists info "
+ 	      "is currently supported.\n"));
+-      return 0;
++      return false;
+     }
+ 
++  uint64_t max_off_count = (length - 8) / offset_size;
++  if (offset_entry_count > max_off_count)
++    offset_entry_count = max_off_count;
+   if (offset_entry_count != 0)
+     {
+       printf (_("\n   Offsets starting at %#tx:\n"), p - section->start);
+@@ -8372,7 +8366,7 @@ display_debug_rnglists_unit_header (struct dwarf_section *  section,
+ 	}
+     }
+ 
+-  return 1;
++  return true;
+ }
+ 
+ static bool
+@@ -8404,6 +8398,7 @@ display_debug_ranges (struct dwarf_section *section,
+   uint64_t last_offset = 0;
+   uint64_t next_rnglists_cu_offset = 0;
+   unsigned char offset_size;
++  bool ok_header = true;
+ 
+   if (bytes == 0)
+     {
+@@ -8493,8 +8488,12 @@ display_debug_ranges (struct dwarf_section *section,
+       /* If we've moved on to the next compile unit in the rnglists section - dump the unit header(s).  */
+       if (is_rnglists && next_rnglists_cu_offset < offset)
+ 	{
+-	  while (next_rnglists_cu_offset < offset)
+-	    display_debug_rnglists_unit_header (section, &next_rnglists_cu_offset, &offset_size);
++	  while (ok_header && next_rnglists_cu_offset < offset)
++	    ok_header = display_debug_rnglists_unit_header (section,
++							    &next_rnglists_cu_offset,
++							    &offset_size);
++	  if (!ok_header)
++	    break;
+ 	  printf (_("    Offset   Begin    End\n"));
+ 	}
+ 
+@@ -8548,10 +8547,12 @@ display_debug_ranges (struct dwarf_section *section,
+     }
+ 
+   /* Display trailing empty (or unreferenced) compile units, if any.  */
+-  if (is_rnglists)
++  if (is_rnglists && ok_header)
+     while (next_rnglists_cu_offset < section->size)
+-      display_debug_rnglists_unit_header (section, &next_rnglists_cu_offset, &offset_size);
+-
++      if (!display_debug_rnglists_unit_header (section,
++					       &next_rnglists_cu_offset,
++					       &offset_size))
++	break;
+   putchar ('\n');
+ 
+   free (range_entries);
+-- 
+2.35.6
+
-- 
2.35.6



  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-04-01 10:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-17  4:12 [OE-core][whinlatter][PATCH 1/4] binutils: Fix CVE-2025-69648 Deepak Rathore -X (deeratho - E INFOCHIPS PRIVATE LIMITED at Cisco)
2026-03-17  4:12 ` [OE-core][whinlatter][PATCH v2 2/4] binutils: Fix CVE-2025-69644 CVE-2025-69647 Deepak Rathore -X (deeratho - E INFOCHIPS PRIVATE LIMITED at Cisco)
2026-03-19 23:56 ` [OE-core][whinlatter][PATCH 1/4] binutils: Fix CVE-2025-69648 Yoann Congal
2026-04-01 10:05   ` [whinlatter][PATCH " Deepak Rathore
2026-04-01 10:17     ` [OE-core] " Yoann Congal
2026-04-02  7:14       ` Deepak Rathore
2026-04-01 10:00 ` Deepak Rathore -X (deeratho - E INFOCHIPS PRIVATE LIMITED at Cisco) [this message]
2026-04-01 10:15   ` Patchtest results for [OE-core][whinlatter][PATCH v2 " patchtest
2026-04-01 10:19   ` Yoann Congal
2026-04-02  6:54   ` [OE-core][whinlatter][PATCH v3 " Deepak Rathore -X (deeratho - E INFOCHIPS PRIVATE LIMITED at Cisco)
2026-04-01 10:04 ` [OE-core][whinlatter][PATCH v3 4/4] binutils: Fix CVE-2025-69652 Deepak Rathore -X (deeratho - E INFOCHIPS PRIVATE LIMITED at Cisco)
2026-04-02  6:57 ` [OE-core][whinlatter][PATCH v4 3/4] binutils: Fix CVE-2025-69649 Deepak Rathore -X (deeratho - E INFOCHIPS PRIVATE LIMITED at Cisco)
2026-04-02  6:58 ` [OE-core][whinlatter][PATCH v4 4/4] binutils: Fix CVE-2025-69652 Deepak Rathore -X (deeratho - E INFOCHIPS PRIVATE LIMITED at Cisco)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260401100022.1173083-1-deeratho@cisco.com \
    --to=deeratho@cisco.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox