From: Peter Marko <peter.marko@siemens.com>
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Cc: peter.marko@siemens.com,
Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>,
Benjamin Robin <benjamin.robin@bootlin.com>,
Yoann Congal <yoann.congal@smile.fr>,
Paul Barker <paul@pbarker.dev>, Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Subject: [wrynose][RFC PATCH 00/11] sbom-cve-check update
Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2026 12:51:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260808105147.42294-1-peter.marko@siemens.com> (raw)
This series updates sbom-cve-check tooling in wrynose to current master.
Unfortunately it shows that having cve-check tooling in upstream
components violates LTS patch acceptance policies.
In this case the most visible is python3-shacl2code (1.0.1 -> 1.1.0),
but also sbom-cve-check-update-nvd-native introduces new features
(which is actually the reason why this upgrade is wanted).
For now this should not be a big issue as all the dependencies are very
new and used exclusively in cve-check, however by time they may be used
in other recipes or tooling, too.
So I am sending this series as RFC to discuss future of CVE checking on
LTS branches.
* should we go with this series as is (possibly updating policy text)?
* or are we stuck with old code for next 3.5 years?
* or separate the tooling to meta-sbom-cve-check which would only have
master branch to service all currently supported releases?
* or create mixins layer (to be also used by AB cve-metrics jobs)?
* or are there some other suggestions how to rework this series?
My preference would be to have cve-check aligned for all supported
releases (even scarthgap), so I would welcome opinions and discussion
on this topic.
Cc: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Benjamin Robin <benjamin.robin@bootlin.com>
Cc: Yoann Congal <yoann.congal@smile.fr>
Cc: Paul Barker <paul@pbarker.dev>
Cc: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Alexander Kanavin (1):
python3-shacl2code: upgrade 1.0.1 -> 1.1.0
Benjamin Robin (3):
python3-sbom-cve-check: update to version 1.3.3
sbom-cve-check-update-cvelist-native: update to version 2026-08-03
sbom-cve-check-update-nvd-native: update to version 2026.08.03-000011
Benjamin Robin (Schneider Electric) (4):
python3-spdx-python-model: update from version 0.0.5 to 0.0.6
python3-sbom-cve-check: update to version 1.3.2
sbom-cve-check-update-cvelist-native: update to version 2026-06-24
sbom-cve-check-update-nvd-native: update to version 2026.06.24-000003
Tim Orling (2):
sbom-cve-check-update-cvelist-native: -> 2026-07-23
sbom-cve-check-update-nvd-native: -> 2026.07.23-000007
Wang Mingyu (1):
sbom-cve-check-update-nvd-native: upgrade 2026.05.07-000006 ->
2026.06.09-000006
...{python3-shacl2code_1.0.1.bb => python3-shacl2code_1.1.0.bb} | 2 +-
...python-model_0.0.5.bb => python3-spdx-python-model_0.0.6.bb} | 2 +-
...-sbom-cve-check_1.3.1.bb => python3-sbom-cve-check_1.3.3.bb} | 2 +-
...07.bb => sbom-cve-check-update-cvelist-native_2026-08-03.bb} | 2 +-
...bb => sbom-cve-check-update-nvd-native_2026.08.03-000011.bb} | 2 +-
5 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
rename meta/recipes-devtools/python/{python3-shacl2code_1.0.1.bb => python3-shacl2code_1.1.0.bb} (81%)
rename meta/recipes-devtools/python/{python3-spdx-python-model_0.0.5.bb => python3-spdx-python-model_0.0.6.bb} (93%)
rename meta/recipes-devtools/sbom-cve-check/{python3-sbom-cve-check_1.3.1.bb => python3-sbom-cve-check_1.3.3.bb} (82%)
rename meta/recipes-devtools/sbom-cve-check/{sbom-cve-check-update-cvelist-native_2026-05-07.bb => sbom-cve-check-update-cvelist-native_2026-08-03.bb} (89%)
rename meta/recipes-devtools/sbom-cve-check/{sbom-cve-check-update-nvd-native_2026.05.07-000006.bb => sbom-cve-check-update-nvd-native_2026.08.03-000011.bb} (89%)
next reply other threads:[~2026-08-08 10:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-08 10:51 Peter Marko [this message]
2026-08-08 10:51 ` [wrynose][RFC PATCH 01/11] sbom-cve-check-update-nvd-native: upgrade 2026.05.07-000006 -> 2026.06.09-000006 Peter Marko
2026-08-08 10:51 ` [wrynose][RFC PATCH 02/11] python3-shacl2code: upgrade 1.0.1 -> 1.1.0 Peter Marko
2026-08-08 10:51 ` [wrynose][RFC PATCH 03/11] python3-spdx-python-model: update from version 0.0.5 to 0.0.6 Peter Marko
2026-08-08 10:51 ` [wrynose][RFC PATCH 04/11] python3-sbom-cve-check: update to version 1.3.2 Peter Marko
2026-08-08 10:51 ` [wrynose][RFC PATCH 05/11] sbom-cve-check-update-cvelist-native: update to version 2026-06-24 Peter Marko
2026-08-08 10:51 ` [wrynose][RFC PATCH 06/11] sbom-cve-check-update-nvd-native: update to version 2026.06.24-000003 Peter Marko
2026-08-08 10:51 ` [wrynose][RFC PATCH 07/11] sbom-cve-check-update-cvelist-native: -> 2026-07-23 Peter Marko
2026-08-08 10:51 ` [wrynose][RFC PATCH 08/11] sbom-cve-check-update-nvd-native: -> 2026.07.23-000007 Peter Marko
2026-08-08 10:51 ` [wrynose][RFC PATCH 09/11] python3-sbom-cve-check: update to version 1.3.3 Peter Marko
2026-08-08 10:51 ` [wrynose][RFC PATCH 10/11] sbom-cve-check-update-cvelist-native: update to version 2026-08-03 Peter Marko
2026-08-08 10:51 ` [wrynose][RFC PATCH 11/11] sbom-cve-check-update-nvd-native: update to version 2026.08.03-000011 Peter Marko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260808105147.42294-1-peter.marko@siemens.com \
--to=peter.marko@siemens.com \
--cc=benjamin.robin@bootlin.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=paul@pbarker.dev \
--cc=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ross.burton@arm.com \
--cc=yoann.congal@smile.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox