From: Marta Rybczynska <rybczynska@gmail.com>
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Cc: a.fatoum@pengutronix.de, adrian.freihofer@siemens.com,
Marta Rybczynska <rybczynska@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/3] oe-selftest: fitimage: support new schema for uboot configuration signing
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2026 08:09:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261008060935.4225-2-rybczynska@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261008060935.4225-1-rybczynska@gmail.com>
Modify testcases after adding signing of a configuration of uboot instead
of various sections separately.
This change includes an additional parameter to _check_signing that allows
more flexible configuration and avoids assumptions on what section has,
and which section does not have a signature - now they are defined
in a data structure.
Signed-off-by: Marta Rybczynska <rybczynska@gmail.com>
---
meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/fitimage.py | 53 +++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/fitimage.py b/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/fitimage.py
index 5d77e6da09..b95e6c158c 100644
--- a/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/fitimage.py
+++ b/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/fitimage.py
@@ -614,7 +614,7 @@ class FitImageTestCase(OESelftestTestCase):
self._is_req_dict_in_dict(sections, req_sections)
# Call the signing related checks if the function is provided by a inherited class
- self._check_signing(bb_vars, sections, num_signatures, uboot_tools_bindir, fitimage_path)
+ self._check_signing(bb_vars, sections, req_sections, num_signatures, uboot_tools_bindir, fitimage_path)
def _get_req_its_paths(self, bb_vars):
self.logger.error("This function needs to be implemented")
@@ -636,7 +636,7 @@ class FitImageTestCase(OESelftestTestCase):
self.logger.error("This function needs to be implemented")
return ({}, 0)
- def _check_signing(self, bb_vars, sections, num_signatures, uboot_tools_bindir, fitimage_path):
+ def _check_signing(self, bb_vars, sections, req_sections, num_signatures, uboot_tools_bindir, fitimage_path):
"""Verify the signatures in the FIT image."""
self.fail("Function needs to be implemented by inheriting classes")
@@ -1076,7 +1076,7 @@ class KernelFitImageBase(FitImageTestCase):
req_sections[section]['Hash algo'] = fit_hash_alg
return (req_sections, num_signatures)
- def _check_signing(self, bb_vars, sections, num_signatures, uboot_tools_bindir, fitimage_path):
+ def _check_signing(self, bb_vars, sections, req_sections, num_signatures, uboot_tools_bindir, fitimage_path):
"""Verify the signature nodes in the FIT image"""
if bb_vars['UBOOT_SIGN_ENABLE'] == "1":
self.logger.debug("Verifying signatures in the FIT image")
@@ -1105,6 +1105,8 @@ class KernelFitImageBase(FitImageTestCase):
for section, values in sections.items():
# Configuration nodes are always signed with UBOOT_SIGN_KEYNAME (if UBOOT_SIGN_ENABLE = "1")
if section.startswith(bb_vars['FIT_CONF_PREFIX']):
+ if 'Sign algo' not in req_values[section]:
+ continue
sign_algo = values.get('Sign algo', None)
req_sign_algo = "%s,%s:%s" % (fit_hash_alg, fit_sign_alg, uboot_sign_keyname)
self.assertEqual(sign_algo, req_sign_algo, 'Signature algorithm for %s not expected value' % section)
@@ -1688,6 +1690,8 @@ class UBootFitImageTests(FitImageTestCase):
'SPL_MKIMAGE_SIGN_ARGS',
'SPL_SIGN_ENABLE',
'SPL_SIGN_KEYNAME',
+ 'SPL_SIGN_INDIVIDUAL',
+ 'SPL_SIGN_CONF',
'TOPDIR',
'UBOOT_ARCH',
'UBOOT_DTB_BINARY',
@@ -1763,10 +1767,14 @@ class UBootFitImageTests(FitImageTestCase):
req_its_paths = []
for image in images:
req_its_paths.append(['/', 'images', image])
- if bb_vars['SPL_SIGN_ENABLE'] == "1":
+ if bb_vars['SPL_SIGN_ENABLE'] == "1" and bb_vars['SPL_SIGN_INDIVIDUAL'] == "1":
req_its_paths.append(['/', 'images', image, 'signature'])
+ elif bb_vars['SPL_SIGN_ENABLE'] == "1" and bb_vars['SPL_SIGN_CONF'] == "1":
+ req_its_paths.append(['/', 'images', image, 'hash-1'])
for configuration in configurations:
req_its_paths.append(['/', 'configurations', configuration])
+ if bb_vars['SPL_SIGN_ENABLE'] == "1" and bb_vars['SPL_SIGN_CONF'] == "1":
+ req_its_paths.append(['/', 'configurations', 'conf', 'signature'])
return (req_its_paths, [])
def _get_req_its_fields(self, bb_vars):
@@ -1874,16 +1882,26 @@ class UBootFitImageTests(FitImageTestCase):
uboot_fit_sign_alg = bb_vars['UBOOT_FIT_SIGN_ALG']
spl_sign_enable = bb_vars['SPL_SIGN_ENABLE']
spl_sign_keyname = bb_vars['SPL_SIGN_KEYNAME']
+ spl_sign_conf = bb_vars['SPL_SIGN_CONF']
+ spl_sign_individual = bb_vars['SPL_SIGN_INDIVIDUAL']
num_signatures = 0
if spl_sign_enable == "1":
for section in req_sections:
- if not section.startswith('conf'):
- req_sections[section]['Sign algo'] = "%s,%s:%s" % \
- (uboot_fit_hash_alg, uboot_fit_sign_alg, spl_sign_keyname)
- num_signatures += 1
+ if section.startswith('conf'):
+ if spl_sign_conf == "1":
+ req_sections[section]['Sign algo'] = "%s,%s:%s" % \
+ (uboot_fit_hash_alg, uboot_fit_sign_alg, spl_sign_keyname)
+ num_signatures += 1
+ else:
+ if spl_sign_conf == "1":
+ req_sections[section]['Hash algo'] = uboot_fit_hash_alg
+ elif spl_sign_individual == "1":
+ req_sections[section]['Sign algo'] = "%s,%s:%s" % \
+ (uboot_fit_hash_alg, uboot_fit_sign_alg, spl_sign_keyname)
+ num_signatures += 1
return (req_sections, num_signatures)
- def _check_signing(self, bb_vars, sections, num_signatures, uboot_tools_bindir, fitimage_path):
+ def _check_signing(self, bb_vars, sections, req_sections, num_signatures, uboot_tools_bindir, fitimage_path):
if bb_vars['UBOOT_FITIMAGE_ENABLE'] == '1' and bb_vars['SPL_SIGN_ENABLE'] == "1":
self.logger.debug("Verifying signatures in the FIT image")
else:
@@ -1896,16 +1914,13 @@ class UBootFitImageTests(FitImageTestCase):
fit_sign_alg_len = FitImageTestCase.MKIMAGE_SIGNATURE_LENGTHS[uboot_fit_sign_alg]
for section, values in sections.items():
# Configuration nodes are always signed with UBOOT_SIGN_KEYNAME (if UBOOT_SIGN_ENABLE = "1")
- if section.startswith("conf"):
- # uboot-sign does not sign configuration nodes
- pass
- else:
- # uboot-sign does not add hash nodes, only image signatures
- sign_algo = values.get('Sign algo', None)
- req_sign_algo = "%s,%s:%s" % (uboot_fit_hash_alg, uboot_fit_sign_alg, spl_sign_keyname)
- self.assertEqual(sign_algo, req_sign_algo, 'Signature algorithm for %s not expected value' % section)
- sign_value = values.get('Sign value', None)
- self.assertEqual(len(sign_value), fit_sign_alg_len, 'Signature value for section %s not expected length' % section)
+ if 'Sign algo' not in req_sections[section]:
+ continue
+ sign_algo = values.get('Sign algo', None)
+ req_sign_algo = "%s,%s:%s" % (uboot_fit_hash_alg, uboot_fit_sign_alg, spl_sign_keyname)
+ self.assertEqual(sign_algo, req_sign_algo, 'Signature algorithm for %s not expected value' % section)
+ sign_value = values.get('Sign value', None)
+ self.assertEqual(len(sign_value), fit_sign_alg_len, 'Signature value for section %s not expected length' % section)
# Search for the string passed to mkimage in each signed section of the FIT image.
# Looks like mkimage supports to add a comment but does not support to read it back.
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-08 6:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-08 6:09 [PATCH v4 1/3] uboot-sign: add the option to sign SPL FIT configurations Marta Rybczynska
2026-10-08 6:09 ` Marta Rybczynska [this message]
2026-10-09 9:13 ` [OE-core] [PATCH v4 2/3] oe-selftest: fitimage: support new schema for uboot configuration signing Mathieu Dubois-Briand
2026-10-09 13:53 ` Freihofer, Adrian
2026-10-08 6:09 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] uboot-sign: enable signing SPL FIT configuration Marta Rybczynska
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261008060935.4225-2-rybczynska@gmail.com \
--to=rybczynska@gmail.com \
--cc=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
--cc=adrian.freihofer@siemens.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox