Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marta Rybczynska <rybczynska@gmail.com>
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Cc: a.fatoum@pengutronix.de, adrian.freihofer@siemens.com,
	Marta Rybczynska <rybczynska@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/3] oe-selftest: fitimage: support new schema for uboot configuration signing
Date: Thu,  8 Oct 2026 08:09:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261008060935.4225-2-rybczynska@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261008060935.4225-1-rybczynska@gmail.com>

Modify testcases after adding signing of a configuration of uboot instead
of various sections separately.

This change includes an additional parameter to _check_signing that allows
more flexible configuration and avoids assumptions on what section has,
and which section does not have a signature - now they are defined
in a data structure.

Signed-off-by: Marta Rybczynska <rybczynska@gmail.com>
---
 meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/fitimage.py | 53 +++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/fitimage.py b/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/fitimage.py
index 5d77e6da09..b95e6c158c 100644
--- a/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/fitimage.py
+++ b/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/fitimage.py
@@ -614,7 +614,7 @@ class FitImageTestCase(OESelftestTestCase):
         self._is_req_dict_in_dict(sections, req_sections)
 
         # Call the signing related checks if the function is provided by a inherited class
-        self._check_signing(bb_vars, sections, num_signatures, uboot_tools_bindir, fitimage_path)
+        self._check_signing(bb_vars, sections, req_sections, num_signatures, uboot_tools_bindir, fitimage_path)
 
     def _get_req_its_paths(self, bb_vars):
         self.logger.error("This function needs to be implemented")
@@ -636,7 +636,7 @@ class FitImageTestCase(OESelftestTestCase):
         self.logger.error("This function needs to be implemented")
         return ({}, 0)
 
-    def _check_signing(self, bb_vars, sections, num_signatures, uboot_tools_bindir, fitimage_path):
+    def _check_signing(self, bb_vars, sections, req_sections, num_signatures, uboot_tools_bindir, fitimage_path):
         """Verify the signatures in the FIT image."""
         self.fail("Function needs to be implemented by inheriting classes")
 
@@ -1076,7 +1076,7 @@ class KernelFitImageBase(FitImageTestCase):
                     req_sections[section]['Hash algo'] = fit_hash_alg
         return (req_sections, num_signatures)
 
-    def _check_signing(self, bb_vars, sections, num_signatures, uboot_tools_bindir, fitimage_path):
+    def _check_signing(self, bb_vars, sections, req_sections, num_signatures, uboot_tools_bindir, fitimage_path):
         """Verify the signature nodes in the FIT image"""
         if bb_vars['UBOOT_SIGN_ENABLE'] == "1":
             self.logger.debug("Verifying signatures in the FIT image")
@@ -1105,6 +1105,8 @@ class KernelFitImageBase(FitImageTestCase):
         for section, values in sections.items():
             # Configuration nodes are always signed with UBOOT_SIGN_KEYNAME (if UBOOT_SIGN_ENABLE = "1")
             if section.startswith(bb_vars['FIT_CONF_PREFIX']):
+                if 'Sign algo' not in req_values[section]:
+                    continue
                 sign_algo = values.get('Sign algo', None)
                 req_sign_algo = "%s,%s:%s" % (fit_hash_alg, fit_sign_alg, uboot_sign_keyname)
                 self.assertEqual(sign_algo, req_sign_algo, 'Signature algorithm for %s not expected value' % section)
@@ -1688,6 +1690,8 @@ class UBootFitImageTests(FitImageTestCase):
             'SPL_MKIMAGE_SIGN_ARGS',
             'SPL_SIGN_ENABLE',
             'SPL_SIGN_KEYNAME',
+            'SPL_SIGN_INDIVIDUAL',
+            'SPL_SIGN_CONF',
             'TOPDIR',
             'UBOOT_ARCH',
             'UBOOT_DTB_BINARY',
@@ -1763,10 +1767,14 @@ class UBootFitImageTests(FitImageTestCase):
         req_its_paths = []
         for image in images:
             req_its_paths.append(['/', 'images', image])
-            if bb_vars['SPL_SIGN_ENABLE'] == "1":
+            if bb_vars['SPL_SIGN_ENABLE'] == "1" and bb_vars['SPL_SIGN_INDIVIDUAL'] == "1":
                 req_its_paths.append(['/', 'images', image, 'signature'])
+            elif bb_vars['SPL_SIGN_ENABLE'] == "1" and bb_vars['SPL_SIGN_CONF'] == "1":
+                req_its_paths.append(['/', 'images', image, 'hash-1'])
         for configuration in configurations:
             req_its_paths.append(['/', 'configurations', configuration])
+            if bb_vars['SPL_SIGN_ENABLE'] == "1" and bb_vars['SPL_SIGN_CONF'] == "1":
+                req_its_paths.append(['/', 'configurations', 'conf', 'signature'])
         return (req_its_paths, [])
 
     def _get_req_its_fields(self, bb_vars):
@@ -1874,16 +1882,26 @@ class UBootFitImageTests(FitImageTestCase):
         uboot_fit_sign_alg = bb_vars['UBOOT_FIT_SIGN_ALG']
         spl_sign_enable = bb_vars['SPL_SIGN_ENABLE']
         spl_sign_keyname = bb_vars['SPL_SIGN_KEYNAME']
+        spl_sign_conf = bb_vars['SPL_SIGN_CONF']
+        spl_sign_individual = bb_vars['SPL_SIGN_INDIVIDUAL']
         num_signatures = 0
         if spl_sign_enable == "1":
             for section in req_sections:
-                if not section.startswith('conf'):
-                    req_sections[section]['Sign algo'] = "%s,%s:%s" % \
-                        (uboot_fit_hash_alg, uboot_fit_sign_alg, spl_sign_keyname)
-                    num_signatures += 1
+                if section.startswith('conf'):
+                    if spl_sign_conf == "1":
+                        req_sections[section]['Sign algo'] = "%s,%s:%s" % \
+                            (uboot_fit_hash_alg, uboot_fit_sign_alg, spl_sign_keyname)
+                        num_signatures += 1
+                else:
+                    if spl_sign_conf == "1":
+                        req_sections[section]['Hash algo'] = uboot_fit_hash_alg
+                    elif spl_sign_individual == "1":
+                        req_sections[section]['Sign algo'] = "%s,%s:%s" % \
+                            (uboot_fit_hash_alg, uboot_fit_sign_alg, spl_sign_keyname)
+                        num_signatures += 1
         return (req_sections, num_signatures)
 
-    def  _check_signing(self, bb_vars, sections, num_signatures, uboot_tools_bindir, fitimage_path):
+    def  _check_signing(self, bb_vars, sections, req_sections, num_signatures, uboot_tools_bindir, fitimage_path):
         if bb_vars['UBOOT_FITIMAGE_ENABLE'] == '1' and bb_vars['SPL_SIGN_ENABLE'] == "1":
             self.logger.debug("Verifying signatures in the FIT image")
         else:
@@ -1896,16 +1914,13 @@ class UBootFitImageTests(FitImageTestCase):
         fit_sign_alg_len = FitImageTestCase.MKIMAGE_SIGNATURE_LENGTHS[uboot_fit_sign_alg]
         for section, values in sections.items():
             # Configuration nodes are always signed with UBOOT_SIGN_KEYNAME (if UBOOT_SIGN_ENABLE = "1")
-            if section.startswith("conf"):
-                # uboot-sign does not sign configuration nodes
-                pass
-            else:
-                # uboot-sign does not add hash nodes, only image signatures
-                sign_algo = values.get('Sign algo', None)
-                req_sign_algo = "%s,%s:%s" % (uboot_fit_hash_alg, uboot_fit_sign_alg, spl_sign_keyname)
-                self.assertEqual(sign_algo, req_sign_algo, 'Signature algorithm for %s not expected value' % section)
-                sign_value = values.get('Sign value', None)
-                self.assertEqual(len(sign_value), fit_sign_alg_len, 'Signature value for section %s not expected length' % section)
+            if 'Sign algo' not in req_sections[section]:
+               continue
+            sign_algo = values.get('Sign algo', None)
+            req_sign_algo = "%s,%s:%s" % (uboot_fit_hash_alg, uboot_fit_sign_alg, spl_sign_keyname)
+            self.assertEqual(sign_algo, req_sign_algo, 'Signature algorithm for %s not expected value' % section)
+            sign_value = values.get('Sign value', None)
+            self.assertEqual(len(sign_value), fit_sign_alg_len, 'Signature value for section %s not expected length' % section)
 
         # Search for the string passed to mkimage in each signed section of the FIT image.
         # Looks like mkimage supports to add a comment but does not support to read it back.
-- 
2.43.0



  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-08  6:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-08  6:09 [PATCH v4 1/3] uboot-sign: add the option to sign SPL FIT configurations Marta Rybczynska
2026-10-08  6:09 ` Marta Rybczynska [this message]
2026-10-09  9:13   ` [OE-core] [PATCH v4 2/3] oe-selftest: fitimage: support new schema for uboot configuration signing Mathieu Dubois-Briand
2026-10-09 13:53   ` Freihofer, Adrian
2026-10-08  6:09 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] uboot-sign: enable signing SPL FIT configuration Marta Rybczynska

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261008060935.4225-2-rybczynska@gmail.com \
    --to=rybczynska@gmail.com \
    --cc=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=adrian.freihofer@siemens.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox