From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Subject: Re: Send bitbake cache (from recipe parsing) to another server
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
From: krzysztof.taborski@nokia.com
X-Originating-Location: Wrocław, Lower Silesia, PL (78.11.8.249)
X-Originating-Platform: Linux Chrome 81
User-Agent: GROUPS.IO Web Poster
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 05:13:38 -0700
References: <8e2dfbd8f03e3390dbeb3f02036c502b02b39169.camel@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <8e2dfbd8f03e3390dbeb3f02036c502b02b39169.camel@linuxfoundation.org>
Message-ID: <21191.1590149618634672759@lists.openembedded.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="soNI9cgczOzMdsT47yqh"
--soNI9cgczOzMdsT47yqh
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 05:04 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
>=20
> Low. Its not designed to do that and you should never need to. Why
> can't it reparse?
I tried to reduce building time. I know, that it is not a big time, but mu=
ltiplying by build count it could bring some benefits.
Nevertheless thanks for the answer. At least I know, that I should abandon=
this idea.
Br,
Krzysztof Taborski
--soNI9cgczOzMdsT47yqh
Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 05:04 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
Low. Its not designed to do that and you should never need to.= WhyI tried to reduce building time. I know, that it is not a big time, but mu= ltiplying by build count it could bring some benefits.
can't it reparse?