From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: Send bitbake cache (from recipe parsing) to another server To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org From: krzysztof.taborski@nokia.com X-Originating-Location: Wrocław, Lower Silesia, PL (78.11.8.249) X-Originating-Platform: Linux Chrome 81 User-Agent: GROUPS.IO Web Poster MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 05:13:38 -0700 References: <8e2dfbd8f03e3390dbeb3f02036c502b02b39169.camel@linuxfoundation.org> In-Reply-To: <8e2dfbd8f03e3390dbeb3f02036c502b02b39169.camel@linuxfoundation.org> Message-ID: <21191.1590149618634672759@lists.openembedded.org> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="soNI9cgczOzMdsT47yqh" --soNI9cgczOzMdsT47yqh Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 05:04 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: >=20 > Low. Its not designed to do that and you should never need to. Why > can't it reparse? I tried to reduce building time. I know, that it is not a big time, but mu= ltiplying by build count it could bring some benefits. Nevertheless thanks for the answer. At least I know, that I should abandon= this idea. Br, Krzysztof Taborski --soNI9cgczOzMdsT47yqh Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 05:04 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
Low. Its not designed to do that and you should never need to.= Why
can't it reparse?
I tried to reduce building time. I know, that it is not a big time, but mu= ltiplying by build count it could bring some benefits.
Nevertheless th= anks for the answer. At least I know, that I should abandon this idea.

Br,
Krzysztof Taborski --soNI9cgczOzMdsT47yqh--