From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [143.182.124.21]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE8CE6AD1A for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 09:00:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from azsmga002.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.35]) by azsmga101.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 28 Jun 2013 02:00:36 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,957,1363158000"; d="scan'208";a="261322350" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.122.97]) by AZSMGA002.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 28 Jun 2013 02:00:22 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: Kai Kang Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 10:00:21 +0100 Message-ID: <2137104.dM5Hszjkko@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.10.3 (Linux/3.8.0-25-generic; KDE/4.10.3; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: <0b6b3178a957a5f1719d6e7d3de74ef10e997266.1372403777.git.kai.kang@windriver.com> References: <0b6b3178a957a5f1719d6e7d3de74ef10e997266.1372403777.git.kai.kang@windriver.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Disable build qt related packagegroups on mips64 with 64 bits userspace X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 09:00:37 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hi Kai, On Friday 28 June 2013 15:48:47 Kai Kang wrote: > Because qt could not be built on mips64 with 64 bits userspace, set > COMPATIBLE_HOST for qt related packagegroups to disable them on mips64 > with 64 bit userspace too. > > Signed-off-by: Kai Kang > --- > .../packagegroups/packagegroup-core-qt.bb | 3 +++ > .../packagegroups/packagegroup-core-qt4e.bb | 3 +++ > .../packagegroup-qt-toolchain-target.inc | 3 +++ > 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-qt/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-qt.bb > b/meta/recipes-qt/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-qt.bb index > 315df33..c993242 100644 > --- a/meta/recipes-qt/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-qt.bb > +++ b/meta/recipes-qt/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-qt.bb > @@ -6,6 +6,9 @@ DESCRIPTION = "Qt package groups" > LICENSE = "MIT" > PR = "r4" > > +# Qt4 could NOT be built on MIPS64 with 64 bits userspace > +COMPATIBLE_HOST_mips64 = "mips64.*-linux-gnun32" > + > inherit packagegroup > > PACKAGES = "${PN}-demoapps" > diff --git a/meta/recipes-qt/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-qt4e.bb > b/meta/recipes-qt/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-qt4e.bb index > 9263828..6ef844f 100644 > --- a/meta/recipes-qt/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-qt4e.bb > +++ b/meta/recipes-qt/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-qt4e.bb > @@ -2,6 +2,9 @@ SUMMARY = "Qt for Embedded Linux (Qt without X11)" > PR = "r2" > LICENSE = "MIT" > > +# Qt4 could NOT be built on MIPS64 with 64 bits userspace > +COMPATIBLE_HOST_mips64 = "mips64.*-linux-gnun32" > + > inherit packagegroup > > # For backwards compatibility after rename > diff --git > a/meta/recipes-qt/packagegroups/packagegroup-qt-toolchain-target.inc > b/meta/recipes-qt/packagegroups/packagegroup-qt-toolchain-target.inc index > 8413eec..fc1ccba 100644 > --- a/meta/recipes-qt/packagegroups/packagegroup-qt-toolchain-target.inc > +++ b/meta/recipes-qt/packagegroups/packagegroup-qt-toolchain-target.inc > @@ -1,5 +1,8 @@ > LICENSE = "MIT" > > +# Qt4 could NOT be built on MIPS64 with 64 bits userspace > +COMPATIBLE_HOST_mips64 = "mips64.*-linux-gnun32" > + > inherit packagegroup > > PACKAGEGROUP_DISABLE_COMPLEMENTARY = "1" I'm fine with the other change; the question is is this one needed in addition? Since the packagegroup-*qt* recipes reference packages from Qt which itself inherits qt4x11/qt4e bbclasses, surely trying to build these will immediately fail for mips64 anyway? Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre