From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S0anS-0003bR-E9 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 16:41:30 +0100 Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Feb 2012 07:32:49 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,315,1320652800"; d="scan'208";a="128644935" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.123.61]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Feb 2012 07:32:48 -0800 From: Paul Eggleton To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 15:32:47 +0000 Message-ID: <2217377.xs2ypPJBB4@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.8.0 (Linux/3.0.0-16-generic-pae; KDE/4.8.0; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20120223163032.0822e104@eb-e6520> References: <1329828974.15011.7.camel@ted> <20120223163032.0822e104@eb-e6520> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: bitbake parsing of IMAGE_INSTALL += # tslib mtd-utils" extremely user unfriendly. X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 15:41:30 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" On Thursday 23 February 2012 16:30:32 Eric B=E9nard wrote: > Richard Purdie a =E9crit : > > What was the output? (I realise I can find out) > >=20 > > With usability issues like this, opening a bug in > > bugzilla.yoctoproject.org is a good idea, particularly as we've bee= n > > focusing on cleaning up this kind of problem. Reporting them with a= > > known reproducible test case helps a lot as when you're looking to = try > > and fix these things, you need a good set of reproducers. > >=20 > > As a quick plug for the work that's been done already, we've now wo= rked > > through many of the issues that were reported so it is worth taking= the > > time to report them! :) >=20 > I had also a bitbake failure after an error in an image and bitbake > exited without any information concerning the error (even when runnin= g > with -DDD I didn't managed to see a log - but I must admit I didn't > search in the whole history). >=20 > Basically I had : > XSERVER +=3D " <=3D=3D=3D=3D missing \ > =09xf86-input-tslib \ > =09" > and bitbake exit with : > ERROR: Command execution failed: Exited with 1 > et nothing more. This got broken last night and fixed last night, so if you update you s= hould=20 have the fix. Cheers, Paul --=20 Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre