From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SFW3v-0001qZ-PO for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2012 21:40:12 +0200 Received: from azsmga001.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.19]) by azsmga101.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Apr 2012 12:30:34 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,315,1320652800"; d="scan'208";a="127118667" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.120.18]) by azsmga001.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Apr 2012 12:30:33 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: Otavio Salvador Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 20:30:32 +0100 Message-ID: <2258638.epBG3X32o7@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.8.0 (Linux/3.0.0-17-generic-pae; KDE/4.8.1; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <8496577.GTiH3Bl1do@helios> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] classes/image_types: add IMAGE_TUNE2FS_ext3 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 19:40:12 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Wednesday 04 April 2012 14:26:26 Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 14:12, Paul Eggleton > > wrote: > > Are you suggesting this would hold the entire post-command to be run? If > > not, what other post command could we be referring to in the case of > > other filesystems? (tune2fs being valid for ext2, ext3 and ext4). > > Yes; it is more generic and for someone using it, it makes no > difference in complexity et all. Actually it does, but I can see some value in it. v2 on the way. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre