From: Changqing Li <changqing.li@windriver.com>
To: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>,
openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org,
bruce.ashfield@gmail.com, mathieu.dubois-briand@bootlin.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] go.bbclass: set buildid to empty string to improve reproducibility
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 11:20:46 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <22a8492c-781f-4450-a107-10397f74bc56@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a065254107d5d01736b8a68b67cf53c0b26fbe6e.camel@linuxfoundation.org>
On 1/14/26 20:36, Richard Purdie wrote:
> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account!
> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
>
> On Wed, 2026-01-14 at 14:44 +0800, changqing.li@windriver.com wrote:
>> From: Changqing Li <changqing.li@windriver.com>
>>
>> Go packages and binaries are stamped with build IDs that record both the
>> action ID, which is a hash of the inputs to the action that produced the
>> packages or binary, and the content ID, which is a hash of the action
>> output, namely the archive or binary itself, Refer [1].
>>
>> And action ID include hash of modroot, which will include build path,
>> so this make go package not reproducible.
>> Refer [2], keying off module path instead of module root directory is a TODO.
>>
>> [snip of log]
>> HASH[moduleIndex]: "go1.25.3"
>> HASH[moduleIndex]: "modroot /build-a/tmp/work/x86-64-v3-wrs-linux/buildah/1.41.5/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/lib/go/src/cmd\n"
>> HASH[moduleIndex]: "package go1.25.3 go index v2 /build-a/tmp/work/x86-64-v3-wrs-linux/buildah/1.41.5/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/lib/go/src/cmd/buildid\n"
>> HASH[moduleIndex]: "file buildid.go 2025-10-13 16:08:43 +0000 UTC 1704\n"
>> HASH[moduleIndex]: "file doc.go 2025-10-13 16:08:43 +0000 UTC 558\n"
>> HASH[moduleIndex]: 007b9fe2edd5b3232f5c98ae6c46e80a435141cb627ba5418c5314c0cbf4df7b
>>
>> Report this issue to upstream, refer [3]
>> Workaround the reproducible by setting buildid to empty, refer [4]
> The trouble is there is a lot of potentially important information
> going into these buildids and you're just removing that functionality
> entirely.
>
> Can we patch out the problematic component until it is fixed instead?
OK. I will check if it can be patched out.
//changqing
> I'm very reticent to remove them entirely, that doesn't feel like a
> good solution.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-15 3:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-14 6:44 [PATCH V4] go.bbclass: set buildid to empty string to improve reproducibility changqing.li
2026-01-14 12:36 ` Richard Purdie
2026-01-15 3:20 ` Changqing Li [this message]
[not found] ` <188AC968E243AEBC.2595076@lists.openembedded.org>
2026-01-23 10:35 ` [OE-core] " Changqing Li
2026-01-23 21:10 ` Randolph Sapp
2026-01-26 8:26 ` Changqing Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=22a8492c-781f-4450-a107-10397f74bc56@windriver.com \
--to=changqing.li@windriver.com \
--cc=bruce.ashfield@gmail.com \
--cc=mathieu.dubois-briand@bootlin.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox