From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Slfdd-00080y-2B for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 14:21:57 +0200 Received: from azsmga001.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.19]) by azsmga101.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Jul 2012 05:10:55 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,315,1320652800"; d="scan'208";a="163077804" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.120.232]) by azsmga001.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Jul 2012 05:10:54 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: "Robert P. J. Day" Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 13:10:53 +0100 Message-ID: <2305047.YA09gvIVbH@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.8.3 (Linux/3.2.0-26-generic-pae; KDE/4.8.3; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <1341219932.23146.187.camel@ted> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: is the PRIORITY variable actually used anywhere? X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 12:21:57 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Monday 02 July 2012 07:29:08 Robert P. J. Day wrote: > oelint.bbclass currently suggests it can be any of "standard", > "required", "optional" or "extra". and perhaps a dumb question -- how > are there *two* default values? not sure what that means. It's worth pointing out that oelint.bbclass is somewhat out-of-date with current practice, so I would take anything you find in it with a pinch of salt. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre