Re: [PATCH] linux-firmware: Package some iwlwifi firmware separately

[Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>]

On Tuesday 25 June 2013 16:35:13 Trevor Woerner wrote:
> On 24 June 2013 10:27, Richard Purdie
> <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >  PACKAGES =+ "${PN}-ralink ${PN}-sd8686 ${PN}-wl12xx ${PN}-vt6656 \
> >  
> >               ${PN}-rtl-license ${PN}-rtl8192cu ${PN}-rtl8192ce
> >               ${PN}-rtl8192su \
> >               ${PN}-broadcom-license ${PN}-bcm4329 ${PN}-bcm4330
> >               ${PN}-bcm4334 \
> > 
> > -             ${PN}-atheros-license ${PN}-ar9170 ${PN}-ar3k ${PN}-ath6k
> > ${PN}-ath9k" +             ${PN}-atheros-license ${PN}-ar9170 ${PN}-ar3k
> > ${PN}-ath6k ${PN}-ath9k \ +             ${PN}-iwlwifi-licence
> > ${PN}-iwlwifi-6000g2a-5 ${PN}-iwlwifi-6000g2b-6"
>
> Does it matter whether you use "licence" or "license"?

For consistency I think it does. I also discovered an incorrect filename at the 
same time as looking into this. I've sent a patch to fix these.

Cheers,
Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre