From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D91A6D299; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 18:36:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Nov 2013 10:36:43 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,730,1378882800"; d="scan'208";a="436168820" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.121.202]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Nov 2013 10:36:42 -0800 From: Paul Eggleton To: Martin Jansa , "openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org" Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 18:36:41 +0000 Message-ID: <2322495.JISmJUGcVm@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.10.5 (Linux/3.8.0-31-generic; KDE/4.10.5; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20131119182012.GE3708@jama> References: <20130611160434.GI3233@jama> <20131119182012.GE3708@jama> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: State of bitbake world X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 18:36:42 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" On Tuesday 19 November 2013 19:20:12 Martin Jansa wrote: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 04:59:19PM +0100, Andreas M=FCller wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Martin Jansa =20 wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:08:25AM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > > >> Starting now I'll use > > >> http://openembedded.org/wiki/Bitbake_World_Status > > >> to post results from my bitbake world buils. > > >=20 > > > It was updated few times since this e-mail and I've received no > > > feedback. > > >=20 > > > Should I continue to post them or nobody except me is really inte= rested? > >=20 > > I am interested but would prefer some short information as mail lik= e > > in the past because prefer events more than polling. >=20 > OK, I'll continue to send summary to list as well. Would it be possible to send the summary as a new email e.g. "state of = bitbake=20 world for " instead of attaching to the existing thread? It might= be a=20 bit selfish, but surely I can't be the only one whose mail client will = dredge=20 up the entire thread under today's date... Cheers, Paul --=20 Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre