From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jakub.szczudlo@nokia.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
Received: from aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF32FC61DC6
	for <webhook@archiver.kernel.org>; Thu, 27 Aug 2026 11:57:34 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [wrynose][PATCH 1/3] expat: fix CVE-2026-50219
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
From: "Jakub Szczudlo (Nokia)" <jakub.szczudlo@nokia.com>
X-Originating-Location: Warsaw, Mazovia, PL (170.85.29.18)
X-Originating-Platform: Windows Firefox 140
User-Agent: GROUPS.IO Web Poster
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2026 04:57:26 -0700
References: <20260824152023.19501-1-jakub.szczudlo@nokia.com> <042a154cf3f65594e4d46156f4df835195b68f90.camel@pbarker.dev> <2789044.1787732076156082495@lists.openembedded.org> <a801b816ecbff66fc39732801eec691af21ce3ac.camel@pbarker.dev> <b8b848b9-81ec-4a9e-bb4c-d1e196eeb479@est.tech> <2326647.1787828731489290062@lists.openembedded.org> <9815edb7-f89d-4a01-a5b0-d33486c95e1b@est.tech>
In-Reply-To: <9815edb7-f89d-4a01-a5b0-d33486c95e1b@est.tech>
Message-ID: <2326647.1787831846397229018@lists.openembedded.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="vPgcuY9a7hkVVDPtcCSm"
List-Id: <openembedded-core.lists.openembedded.org>
X-Webhook-Received: from 45-33-107-173.ip.linodeusercontent.com [45.33.107.173] by
 aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org with HTTPS for
 <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>; Thu, 27 Aug 2026 11:57:34 -0000
X-Groupsio-URL: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/244480

--vPgcuY9a7hkVVDPtcCSm
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

>=20
> Hi Jakub,
> Thanks for this, since you already did some analysis for scartgap, is it
> possible for you to work on the scarthgap branch, and I can work on
> wrynose (So, we don't accidentally push the same patch)?
>=20
> Thanks!
>=20

Hi Adarsh,

sure I will work on scarthgap. I will test more and If outcome will be posi=
tive I will push the patch.
Best regards

--vPgcuY9a7hkVVDPtcCSm
Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<blockquote>
<div>Hi Jakub,<br />Thanks for this, since you already did some analysis fo=
r scartgap, is it possible for you to work on the scarthgap branch, and I c=
an work on wrynose (So, we don't accidentally push the same patch)?<br /><b=
r />Thanks!</div>
</blockquote>
<div>Hi Adarsh,<br /><br />sure I will work on scarthgap. I will test more =
and If outcome will be positive I will push the patch.<br />Best regards</d=
iv>

--vPgcuY9a7hkVVDPtcCSm--