From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S7pyV-0007BV-WC for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 16:18:53 +0100 Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Mar 2012 08:09:56 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,352,1309762800"; d="scan'208";a="117633294" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.123.190]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Mar 2012 08:09:55 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: Darren Hart Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:09:54 +0000 Message-ID: <2443372.s5EABu74ja@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.8.0 (Linux/3.0.0-16-generic-pae; KDE/4.8.1; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: <4F60B091.9010005@linux.intel.com> References: <4F60B091.9010005@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] scripts/bitbake: ensure user is in build directory X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:18:53 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Wednesday 14 March 2012 07:52:01 Darren Hart wrote: > Should this have some kind of prefix? "ERROR: " or something along those > lines for consistency with other output? I did wonder about that; in the end I elected to be consistent with the python version errors in the same script (although I was the one who added those IIRC... heh). Perhaps we ought to add the "ERROR: " prefix to all of the errors in the wrapper script. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre