From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D0AED6ACE9 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2025 11:34:34 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fitimage: Add support for UBOOT_MKIMAGE_EXTRA_OPTS To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org From: "Kavinaya S" X-Originating-Location: Hyderabad, Telangana, IN (163.116.219.95) X-Originating-Platform: Windows Edge 143 User-Agent: GROUPS.IO Web Poster MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 03:34:31 -0800 References: <20251210110443.3230272-1-kavinaya@qti.qualcomm.com> <57dd38bf-653d-4b74-8de4-d05f4d2b9797@windriver.com> <7a13d7376a83bb7deb6374124bc42669d86803fc.camel@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <7a13d7376a83bb7deb6374124bc42669d86803fc.camel@gmail.com> Message-ID: <248214.1766057671237496490@lists.openembedded.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: X-Webhook-Received: from 45-33-107-173.ip.linodeusercontent.com [45.33.107.173] by aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org with HTTPS for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2025 11:34:34 -0000 X-Groupsio-URL: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/228113 On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 03:01 AM, Adrian Freihofer wrote: > > Defining an UBOOT_ name-spaced variable in image-fitimage.conf looks > strange. But I see why you ended up with that: > * All the mkimage related variables start with UBOOT_ > * This variable is used by the kernel-fit-image.bbclass only. Defining > it in uboot-config.bbclass looks strange as well. >=20 > But, all UBOOT_ variables are defined in uboot-config.bbclass. Would it > be more consistent if the variable would be defined in uboot- > config.bbclass or if the variable would be renamed to > FIT_MKIMAGE_EXTRA_OPTS? > Hi Adrian, Sure. We can use FIT_MKIMAGE_EXTRA_OPTS. I have uploaded a new patch to add= ress this.