From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga12.intel.com (mga12.intel.com [192.55.52.136]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C58766C0EA for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 22:36:48 +0000 (UTC) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 30 Sep 2019 15:36:49 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,568,1559545200"; d="scan'208";a="274811257" Received: from hanshuan-mobl1.gar.corp.intel.com (HELO linux.fritz.box) ([10.249.65.161]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 Sep 2019 15:36:45 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: Dmitry Kargin , Chandana Kalluri , Manjukumar Harthikote Matha Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2019 11:36:42 +1300 Message-ID: <2678038.QAzkJJSIsR@linux.fritz.box> Organization: Intel Corporation In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org, "openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org" Subject: Re: [yocto] Xilinx/meta-jupyter layer X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 22:36:48 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" FYI I've just changed the layer index entry to point to the new repo. New content should be indexed in a few hours. Thanks for working this out! Dmitry: sorry, for clarity did you mean a separate mailing list or one of the YP / OE ones ? Cheers, Paul On Saturday, 28 September 2019 9:52:26 AM NZDT Dmitry Kargin wrote: > Nice job! > > You have my permission, if it is needed to change > https://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layer/meta-jupyter/ > links to your repository. > > >Would you recommend maintaining this layer separately or... > I'd like to keep it separately from meta- and openembedded. > > >Would you suggest having a separate mailing list > meta-jupyter mailing list is fine. > > On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 at 23:12, Chandana Kalluri wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > https://github.com/Xilinx/meta-jupyter is a meta-jupyter layer containing > > recipes for jupyter notebook. The initial recipes are based of Dmitry > > Kargin's meta-jupyter layer > > https://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layer/meta-jupyter/. > > This layer has not been updated for a while. > > > > The Xilinx/meta-jupyter layer also adds recipes for python3 based > > notebooks apart from existing python2 based notebooks. > > This layer has been tested using Yocto thud layer and by running jupyter > > notebooks on Ultra96 community boards. > > We would like to maintain Xilinx/meta-jupyter layer actively and welcome > > contributions to this layer either through pull requests or via patches > > sent to meta-xilinx mailing list until a mailing list for meta-jupyter is > > in place. In the next cycle we will deprecate python2 recipes. > > > > A question to community, > > - Would you recommend maintaining this layer separately in the current > > github.com/Xilinx location or be included under meta- openembedded layers. > > - Would you suggest having a separate mailing list ? > > > > Thanks, > > Chandana > > > > > -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre