From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C89A60289 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:20:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Jul 2013 05:20:14 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,1043,1363158000"; d="scan'208";a="368593283" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.122.35]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Jul 2013 05:20:11 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: "Burton, Ross" Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 13:20:10 +0100 Message-ID: <2680058.xDZ0dG4UEH@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.10.4 (Linux/3.8.0-26-generic; KDE/4.10.4; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <1373303785-8508-1-git-send-email-eu@felipetonello.com> <51DDACEA.1080503@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] pulseaudio: Added consolekit dependency for pulseaudio-module-console-kit package X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:20:15 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Thursday 11 July 2013 11:32:14 Burton, Ross wrote: > On 10 July 2013 19:50, Saul Wold wrote: > > Is this really a build-time dependency or a runtime dependency specific to > > the pulseaudio-module? > > It's a runtime dependency, but from memory bitbake doesn't manage to > piece the chain together enough to actually build consolekit (probably > because the packages are dynamically created). If it's a stated RDEPENDS in the recipe it must be, and pulseaudio.inc already has RDEPENDS_pulseaudio-module-console-kit =+ "consolekit" so unless the module package doesn't actually end up being "pulseaudio-module-console-kit" I'm not sure why anything else should be needed. It's usually only when the dependencies get added dynamically at package time that bitbake not building a dependency can be a problem (we've seen this with recipes containing perl scripts for example). Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre