Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] base.bbclass: Fix PACKAGE_ARCH typo
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 11:40:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2717944.t8ib7oWynB@perseus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <706a2e04c5d4373a4f5a0dfbaf94bc63f95bc850.1311776363.git.richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>

On Wednesday, July 27, 2011 03:29:15 PM Richard Purdie wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
> ---
>  meta/classes/base.bbclass |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/meta/classes/base.bbclass b/meta/classes/base.bbclass
> index 3ed1bb8..a0a189f 100644
> --- a/meta/classes/base.bbclass
> +++ b/meta/classes/base.bbclass
> @@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ python () {
>          # if multiple differences are present?
>          # Look through PACKAGE_ARCHS for the priority order?
>          if pkgarch and pkgarch == mach_arch:
> -            bb.data.setVar('PACAKGE_ARCH', "${MACHINE_ARCH}", d)
> +            bb.data.setVar('PACKAGE_ARCH', "${MACHINE_ARCH}", d)

nice I was wondering this warning in my builds

>              bb.warn("Recipe %s is marked as only being architecture
> specific but seems to have machine specific packages?! The recipe may as
> well mark itself as machine specific directly." % d.getVar("PN", True)) }
-- 
Khem Raj



      reply	other threads:[~2011-07-30 18:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-27 14:29 [PATCH 0/4] Various Misc tweaks Richard Purdie
2011-07-27 14:29 ` [PATCH 1/4] base.bbclass: Add compatibility package name mapping handler Richard Purdie
2011-07-27 14:44   ` Mark Hatle
2011-07-27 14:50     ` Richard Purdie
2011-07-27 15:45       ` Koen Kooi
2011-07-27 15:02     ` Phil Blundell
2011-07-27 15:04       ` Mark Hatle
2011-07-27 15:06       ` Koen Kooi
2011-07-27 15:13         ` Phil Blundell
2011-07-30 18:43           ` Khem Raj
2011-07-30 20:01             ` Phil Blundell
2011-07-27 14:29 ` [PATCH 2/4] gcc: Drop part of the 64bithack patch which is no longer used Richard Purdie
2011-07-28 14:35   ` Lu, Lianhao
2011-07-28 14:55     ` Kumar Gala
2011-08-02 18:28   ` Khem Raj
2011-07-27 14:29 ` [PATCH 3/4] module-init-tools-cross: Drop static binaries patch as a better fix has been merged Richard Purdie
2011-07-27 14:29 ` [PATCH 4/4] base.bbclass: Fix PACKAGE_ARCH typo Richard Purdie
2011-07-30 18:40   ` Khem Raj [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2717944.t8ib7oWynB@perseus \
    --to=raj.khem@gmail.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox