From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RQ4cW-00031m-89 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 23:03:16 +0100 Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Nov 2011 13:56:53 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.69,511,1315206000"; d="scan'208";a="90400786" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.121.192]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Nov 2011 13:56:52 -0800 From: Paul Eggleton To: Koen Kooi Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 21:56:51 +0000 Message-ID: <2738365.H3cX2LU5D7@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.7.3 (Linux/3.0.0-12-generic-pae; KDE/4.7.3; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: <22478035-0923-402B-8617-45F140D38288@dominion.thruhere.net> References: <1321303197.26881.74.camel@ted> <22478035-0923-402B-8617-45F140D38288@dominion.thruhere.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] distcc: make distccmon-gnome optional and default to off X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 22:03:16 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Monday 14 November 2011 21:55:28 Koen Kooi wrote: > This patch changes the default behaviour in a way that distros need to > update their configs in order to keep the status quo. I know I use > distccmon-gnome on my boards, I have to say I'm surprised, I hadn't considered the distcc UI to be particularly useful in our context so I'm surprised that anyone is actually using it, but everyone has their own requirements I guess. > but will I remember 2 months from now that > this patch went in? I asked this before in a different context, but I'll > ask again: do you expect distro maintainers to vet each and every commit > that goes into OE-core to find out when default got (silently) changed? There are degrees of "silently". Given that this patch is being reviewed on the mailing list I think it's anything but silent. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre