From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DAD86D840 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 18:57:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Dec 2013 10:57:27 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,826,1378882800"; d="scan'208";a="446924497" Received: from akagikob-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.121.234]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Dec 2013 10:57:22 -0800 From: Paul Eggleton To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 18:57:20 +0000 Message-ID: <2780723.Eg1JlMHale@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.10.5 (Linux/3.8.0-31-generic; KDE/4.10.5; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1386182811-3588-1-git-send-email-andrei@gherzan.ro> References: <1386182811-3588-1-git-send-email-andrei@gherzan.ro> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] libav: Add v9.10 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 18:57:27 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Wednesday 04 December 2013 20:46:50 Andrei Gherzan wrote: > This version includes libavresample needed for packages like xbmc. > To use this version add: > PREFERRED_VERSION_libav = "9.10". We really want to avoid having too many versions of the same recipe hanging around. However, it seems premature to drop 0.8.x at this point. Perhaps we should drop the libav_git recipe that we currently have, since that is just pointing at an old 0.9.x version? Anyone have any thoughts on this? Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre