From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-f177.google.com (mail-pf0-f177.google.com [209.85.192.177]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 229D8731E9; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 17:36:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pf0-f177.google.com with SMTP id q63so87059451pfb.1; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 09:36:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:subject:date:message-id:to:mime-version; bh=eGfglY0MT/VUrLLWlg9ntuNqZ9fQdvbKn+UnVB/W9XI=; b=aY0/iu8rH1VN+26BRqZ93q06f0+wF5onLuDMGnNrKq3z89B4kj9y0gDS/23uYk9LIG CL0k5SMl1OwmlholdTzfLeOKhJyolIGn6qa3kPDagj8iVtjWVtKDVoNPM6YcHYwX0ApL ktscJGyxntBiSWaJkadot95HLKgVgAxz25QytIFfDLNyTMlDBxzl4sIhXLNTVOpFpT2j XKB1ocLSK9hLYgnFSWZigTUs/EQGAMGh7/7qo+Fhpd5pI2/ORasMmkFJaZJEK0TkI4HG qvJBo0Nrq0eoOO3t2Z5o+amByOvpyMNUruqskEUVBs0PhFlNce4b7flN5iukPhLCJdz7 pJLQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-type:subject:date:message-id:to :mime-version; bh=eGfglY0MT/VUrLLWlg9ntuNqZ9fQdvbKn+UnVB/W9XI=; b=VxtXw4Ju8fY0vdKIRdC3RLF2g0WMbS2sIpvXopuf7TX5wgv6QLPmiTgCWRt3cCvsp3 EB43OOLZfLAXEQs+XTXzd0qC08+4dKKokOWLFVegwDIbChglZosbPFQmAX8DbIR24VWG Jp0MW113xfTTHLk9ht1GcaAiEsG/J0/kUs4eqapYZzIp59WpfyTqM1MWtQAxr4dqgHUv B3fcD1yprkdYN5NHQ+beR2HhcFvb20iQs7V7PlyXCEh5VMGz8yngUj6NqvCR6VMHyroz Wwv7dJ9ghev4aQvm0gJdmOqoTzGZRcpyxM6ZqRHicsXwnKcfoDQaRn9sLwTgde5XYypA bSog== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnxZbI3HrMnPI2ZVB2X+6ISeJyDbI07dz7xxxt9OZUE1w/UTJyFDey4WkosDpnxmcAdo3MDvEsfRmQb8FLUZ+WOZ0WR+w== X-Received: by 10.98.71.211 with SMTP id p80mr43840755pfi.135.1452706610207; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 09:36:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2601:646:8802:5d5c:e406:58c9:b337:c1d9? ([2601:646:8802:5d5c:e406:58c9:b337:c1d9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s19sm3953830pfs.62.2016.01.13.09.36.49 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 13 Jan 2016 09:36:49 -0800 (PST) From: Khem Raj X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.6b2 Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 09:36:44 -0800 Message-Id: <2EB9392C-58FE-4807-9E1D-41738D761079@gmail.com> To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer , openembeded-devel Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112) Subject: Remove pth recipe X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 17:36:51 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 76014 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_51FB96B4-101C-4C75-8F89-FF7748EABF5F"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 --Apple-Mail=_51FB96B4-101C-4C75-8F89-FF7748EABF5F Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi All, We are carrying pth recipe in OE-Core. 1. There are no packages in OE-Core which depend on it. 2. pth is quite old ( last release was in 2006) moreover there is npth = replacement available and we have recipe in OE-Core I would like to propose a removal of this recipe but before doing so, but wanted to find if there are any active users of this package if you use it the please respond -Khem --Apple-Mail=_51FB96B4-101C-4C75-8F89-FF7748EABF5F Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iEYEARECAAYFAlaWizAACgkQuwUzVZGdMxSuZgCeLqju8ouXTzETZ/3GwU1woS17 OMQAnjC27UJ2fPOCOjUDZAVagzFxj7rX =/l5N -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_51FB96B4-101C-4C75-8F89-FF7748EABF5F--