Re: [OE-core] meta-rust -> oe-core

["Randy MacLeod" <randy.macleod@windriver.com>]

On 2021-02-17 6:45 a.m., Anatol Belski wrote:
> Hi Randy,
>
> thanks for driving progress on this work.
>
> On Tue, 2021-02-16 at 21:40 -0500, Randy MacLeod wrote:
>> I've updated poky-contrib with my merge of meta-rust to oe-core:
>>
>> http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=rmacleod/rust-wip-2021-02-16
>>
>> The build status is fine (shown below) aside from qemuriscv64/musl
>> and qemuppc/musl.
>>
>> Khem is working on the qemuriscv64/musl problem with upstream rust
>> devs.
>> qemuppc/musl fails due to:
>>      libunwind.cpp:66:3: error: #error Architecture not supported
>>
>> Known issues if someone is interested:
>>
>> 1. I have an updated librsvg that isn't building using autotools
>>      It does build with cargo but I doubt that will produce a library
>>      that is usable. See
>> https://github.com/meta-rust/meta-rust/issues/264
>>
>>   
>> http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=rmacleod/librsvg-broken-wip-2021-02-16
>>
>> 2. native-sdk support is broken:
>>       https://github.com/meta-rust/meta-rust/issues/236
>>      As shown in my OE talk last year, you can do rust application
>>      development and testing without this but it would be best to
>>      fix this bug and have rust behave like other YP toolchains.
>>
> I was working on the SDK support some passt weeks and coincidentially
> filed a PR yesterday
>
> https://github.com/meta-rust/meta-rust/pull/313
>
> This is definitely a wanted feature. If some would have time for a
> review, it'd be great.

That's great! I've been stuck in meetings all day but
I should have time tomorrow to review and test this change.


> Please also let me know how it would best be
> integrated into your patch.
Let's use the meta-rust review process and once it's
merged to master, I'll bring it over to my poky-contrib

branch.

Thanks,

../Randy


>
> Thanks
>
> Anatol
>
>> 3. There's an cargo-fetcher proposal sent to the bitbake
>>      list from Andreas but I don't see a patch to meta-rust to
>>      make the two patchsets work together. Andreas, is that something
>>      that you can do, even if it's just a quick change to get started?
>>
>> 4. We're (Vinay via WR) working on a way to use the rustc test suite.
>>      More to come on that later this week.
>>
>> Sorry that this has dragged on for so long.
>> Any help would be appreciated.
>>
>>
>>
>> 
>>
>

-- 
# Randy MacLeod
# Wind River Linux