From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-yx0-f175.google.com ([209.85.213.175]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Qozby-0004Nr-UG for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 17:13:27 +0200 Received: by yxi19 with SMTP id 19so1148905yxi.6 for ; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 08:09:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=GE1K52ZkBFtNzjHoWVzMu21ab1WVUYOD22zLXMIQNos=; b=PVrUkRtY92u82DHGxCFzxYVq5uAT4K7g++Rs5HL2SwZTyjH7sqXOo0LLw1hvikmL0+ jrDLOR3/rDE+RBMl1lMJ63kPl7DRypfzXuz8qNkA0YP2dBBc0vagXO18eDlhXF6J/TIr hreLUjy1fvlGpOwlhTPz+ijPQH1/9opYsPKjU= Received: by 10.142.186.18 with SMTP id j18mr822957wff.406.1312470542415; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 08:09:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from perseus.localnet (natint3.juniper.net [66.129.224.36]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i2sm470369wfd.20.2011.08.04.08.09.01 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 04 Aug 2011 08:09:01 -0700 (PDT) From: Khem Raj To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 08:08:58 -0700 Message-ID: <3084551.78r5ORDKhl@perseus> Organization: Sakrah User-Agent: KMail/4.7.0 (Linux/2.6.38-10-generic; KDE/4.7.0; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1312465942.2344.743.camel@rex> References: <1312465942.2344.743.camel@rex> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] Various site files: Drop monotone X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 15:13:27 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Thursday, August 04, 2011 02:52:22 PM Richard Purdie wrote: > On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 15:56 -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > > Not in oe-core nor meta-oe and based on oe.dev, possibly incomplete. > > > > Signed-off-by: Tom Rini > > --- > > > > meta/site/arm-common | 3 --- > > meta/site/arm-linux | 3 --- > > meta/site/common-glibc | 3 --- > > meta/site/ix86-common | 3 --- > > meta/site/mips-linux | 5 ----- > > meta/site/mips-linux-uclibc | 5 ----- > > meta/site/mipsel-linux | 5 ----- > > meta/site/powerpc32-linux | 4 ---- > > meta/site/sh-common | 3 --- > > 9 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/meta/site/arm-common b/meta/site/arm-common > > index 2129298..7317a13 100644 > > --- a/meta/site/arm-common > > +++ b/meta/site/arm-common > > @@ -116,9 +116,6 @@ with_broken_putenv=${with_broken_putenv=no} > > > > # links > > ac_cv_lib_png_png_create_info_struct=${ac_cv_lib_png_png_create_info_s > > truct=yes}> > > -# mono > > -cv_mono_sizeof_sunpath=108 > > - > > > > # mysql > > mysql_cv_func_atomic_sub=${mysql_cv_func_atomic_sub=no} > > mysql_cv_func_atomic_add=${mysql_cv_func_atomic_add=no} > > Isn't mono different from monotone? yes its for mono. I think we should keep it since there are many users of mono from oe.dev world who would want mono in future may be from future meta-mono > > We don't have mono in OE.core either so the patch is probably fine but I > just wanted to mention it... > > Cheers, > > Richard > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core -- Khem Raj