From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pz0-f43.google.com ([209.85.210.43]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QnGlf-0003Ww-Gb for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 23:08:19 +0200 Received: by pzk1 with SMTP id 1so8637346pzk.16 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 14:04:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=Aan9Inz31ewy5YXJMpRQeGkU1ydVX64xOHxGTdqBEZw=; b=HAmjqorwWdzyzUqESdEUQBFTWOedtgiu6+Qj7OWMnzzgawZeZXRYqe9kTuRfWOuUcM xTMPrXQob++uGaMWPWCZgN1u/Z6Ngd/Xfke4Q8accwXPZJ41XDBBJ1kCp0T2YmPzoScX PmUqSSpQ+zKIdJqSi7pLZTytgnzVH3K9Ryf5c= Received: by 10.68.16.197 with SMTP id i5mr4149921pbd.410.1312059840340; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 14:04:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from perseus.localnet (99-57-141-118.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [99.57.141.118]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p7sm3603003pbn.65.2011.07.30.14.03.59 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 30 Jul 2011 14:03:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Khem Raj To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 14:03:57 -0700 Message-ID: <3203108.rdKDhXfA9V@perseus> Organization: Sakrah User-Agent: KMail/4.7.0 (Linux/2.6.38-10-generic; KDE/4.7.0; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1312051187.3497.9.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> References: <9242177.qDpCW2S6UF@perseus> <1312051187.3497.9.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] sudo: Drop sudo_cv_uid_t_len from site files X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 21:08:19 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Saturday, July 30, 2011 07:39:47 PM Phil Blundell wrote: > On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 10:25 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > On Wednesday, July 27, 2011 03:56:45 PM Tom Rini wrote: > > > We were just setting this to the assumed default. If anything, this > > > belongs in the libc files if we must set it. > > > > uid_t is not a libc controlled define. Its kernel controlled (though > > kernel- headers) > > No, that's incorrect. The uid_t that applications see is controlled by > libc and decoupled from __kernel_uid_t. There is logic in glibc to > convert between types if necessary. uclibc passes on whatever kernel defines it to. rethinking, probably libc is ok for it. > > p. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core -- Khem Raj