From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52710605F3 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 15:19:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 25 Jun 2013 08:19:22 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,937,1363158000"; d="scan'208";a="335290424" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.122.97]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 25 Jun 2013 08:19:21 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: Nicolas Dechesne Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 16:19:20 +0100 Message-ID: <3374023.12gJcMyuIe@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.10.3 (Linux/3.8.0-25-generic; KDE/4.10.3; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: Issues with Qt5/mesa and eglfs X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 15:19:21 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Tuesday 25 June 2013 13:59:55 Nicolas Dechesne wrote: > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Nicolas Dechesne < > nicolas.dechesne@linaro.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Nicolas Dechesne < > > > > nicolas.dechesne@linaro.org> wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Paul Eggleton < > >> > >> paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> wrote: > >>> I wasn't watching closely but my impression is there were a large number > >>> of > >>> changes associated with the mesa upgrade. Is the upgrade itself > >>> necessary for > >>> the fix? > >> > >> no, i don't think so. I think we might be able to just update the patches > >> that deal with the X11/no X11 support. but i haven't tested that yet. i > >> just did a quick test by cherry picking the complete commit (e.g. mesa > >> upgrade) to verify that it's actually fixing my problem. now that i know > >> it > >> does, i will try to just upgrade the patches without the mesa upgrade and > >> report how it goes. > > > > ok, i was able to backport the mesa patch from 9.1.3 to 9.0.2 > > (EGL-Mutate-NativeDisplayType-depending-on-config.patch) , the backport > > was > > more or less trivial. and then i did this in dylan branch: > > > > --- a/meta/recipes-graphics/mesa/mesa-9.0.2.inc > > +++ b/meta/recipes-graphics/mesa/mesa-9.0.2.inc > > @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ SRC_URI = " > > ftp://ftp.freedesktop.org/pub/mesa/${PV}/MesaLib-${PV}.tar.bz2 \ > > > > file://0002-cross-compile.patch \ > > file://cross-glsl.patch \ > > file://dont-fail-if-libX11-isnt-installed.patch \ > > > > - file://fix-egl-compilation-without-x11-headers.patch \ > > + file://EGL-Mutate-NativeDisplayType-depending-on-config.patch > > \ > > > > " > > > > and it does fix the build issue i had (mesa/qt5/non X11 distro). > > should that be merged into dylan (since it's merged in master already) or > > do we need to wait for the 'final' patch in upstream to be ready? > > Paul, Martin, what do you think about this? i have the (trivial) dylan > backport ready. Do you think it's the right time to get it merged? I'd say please send the patch to the mailing list (marked with [dylan]) and then we can review it. By the sounds of things it should be OK. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre