From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-f195.google.com (mail-pf0-f195.google.com [209.85.192.195]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C288260938 for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 15:29:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pf0-f195.google.com with SMTP id n24so5105365pfb.3 for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 08:29:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DApbKcdE/DkeFev1NdTTysfwnTWp5AcLDcUlDsEu1C4=; b=g9cPAUgECUc0cD3VW1VXqJrCM741Tyq6mXdYseg9bdEdM/N9CtjbHckTcybkE7SZG6 vyReaIP9h5LaFolKQYcSI7Lv6RCyHLOApZiy38GKvWvEF/cjakk2put7mfdPqsPLnf9M gaSXCdM9Gzy9/1FeRywbsvtLsbA65vhv2M9i/I0BX80KJepvhBEf3A9LwHmtubx5N/8L zAt741gtXDTeI81CkdDTpAc10nTj+WvD5A5Of+roiMOBPZAZYptHy6Wrot9/lsrqp3dW FppUkmYvCBbPjBu6VM0FpG9LehJ5MYH70wbZPu9TXe7+wS5+krf5zmei/Yz3FjiWdMBK wQ/w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DApbKcdE/DkeFev1NdTTysfwnTWp5AcLDcUlDsEu1C4=; b=ZzmOGzbcybu35maAciAFxJbE+GJ67YQxjiLR1AOXnpEfcK7QQbEJiBDY81Plv8+KS4 qHW3AC2NmZYlBszSfIwIAIlCAJBe1Yh5pCP8GeSurlFGCwIoK2kY7J15CIPQ3VYlwafU Rf3OtSTebVbMeIZkc14jINvZ3HF6LPj1DQI3rTMxBu9ejgdKvQtwLycNAVQzwixiQoHm nBm9QJO/8WD7HKuolLVdo2NZbTcABsXNnOt9tnTQI+HHPVWo5291OhhOHAVTuTY40ipN jUQhFTCdJXVZcx2BDeD/nDQT05bxMUlKwehZtdNEycV1p4t9+M9ocokYfZvw+MBpuLd5 VncA== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9Rlqp/z4GXD9AjevSZSUwRfZJsYdAdtcF8yfEr3xWlSJst9Ii5fa22yxV/KqmQ4FEQ== X-Received: by 10.98.157.199 with SMTP id a68mr12593950pfk.75.1475249346050; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 08:29:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2601:202:4001:9ea0:78a7:4535:8444:722c? ([2601:202:4001:9ea0:78a7:4535:8444:722c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 28sm28815790pfp.33.2016.09.30.08.29.05 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 30 Sep 2016 08:29:05 -0700 (PDT) To: Joshua Lock , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org References: <1475226567-7151-1-git-send-email-joshua.g.lock@intel.com> From: akuster808 Message-ID: <353ba145-4e04-d586-8bf9-d9058339efbd@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 08:29:04 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1475226567-7151-1-git-send-email-joshua.g.lock@intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] multilib_header: avoid sstate checksum issues for -nativesdk recipes X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 15:29:05 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 09/30/2016 02:09 AM, Joshua Lock wrote: > Much as with -native recipes, as addressed in commit > b15730caf0d4c40271796887505507f2501958bb, arch specific variables > like MIPSPKGSFX_ABI were affecting -nativesdk sstate checksums for > recipes like nativesdk-glibc-initial. Since commit b15730caf0d4c40271796887505507f2501958bb is in Jethro and Krogoth, do both of those branch need this fix? - armin > > Disable multilib_header for nativesdk as we don't use multilibs in > this scenario. > > [YOCTO #10320] > > Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock > --- > meta/classes/multilib_header.bbclass | 5 +++++ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/meta/classes/multilib_header.bbclass b/meta/classes/multilib_header.bbclass > index 5ee0a2d..304c28e 100644 > --- a/meta/classes/multilib_header.bbclass > +++ b/meta/classes/multilib_header.bbclass > @@ -52,3 +52,8 @@ oe_multilib_header() { > oe_multilib_header_class-native () { > return > } > + > +# Nor do we need multilib headers for nativesdk builds. > +oe_multilib_header_class-nativesdk () { > + return > +}