From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S0DoJ-0004Qd-RX for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 16:08:52 +0100 Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Feb 2012 07:00:30 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,315,1320652800"; d="scan'208";a="120100494" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.123.31]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Feb 2012 07:00:30 -0800 From: Paul Eggleton To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 15:00:28 +0000 Message-ID: <3560864.DXtqnyRg82@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.8.0 (Linux/3.0.0-16-generic-pae; KDE/4.8.0; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: <4F450191.20609@opendreambox.org> References: <1329910007-8441-1-git-send-email-obi@opendreambox.org> <1329917474.20261.142.camel@ted> <4F450191.20609@opendreambox.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] drop dependency on GNOME if x11 is disabled X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 15:08:52 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Wednesday 22 February 2012 15:54:09 Andreas Oberritter wrote: > Nevertheless, I understand that 'x11' isn't appropriate. The upside of > using 'x11' was that it wouldn't break distributions, like new flags > would do. Incidentally, I sent an RFC patch yesterday to add a mechanism to make it possible to add new DISTRO_FEATURES without breaking existing distro configurations. So far I haven't had any comments. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre