From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [143.182.124.37]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 426A16BE53 for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 10:25:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from azsmga001.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.19]) by azsmga102.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 03 Sep 2013 03:25:47 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,1013,1367996400"; d="scan'208";a="355184197" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.123.86]) by azsmga001.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 03 Sep 2013 03:25:44 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: Khem Raj Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 11:25:43 +0100 Message-ID: <3896060.ZzyEfkrHt7@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.10.5 (Linux/3.8.0-29-generic; KDE/4.10.5; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <1377672247-16456-1-git-send-email-raj.khem@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] systemd: Cover for udev-systemd X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 10:25:48 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Tuesday 03 September 2013 11:20:18 Burton, Ross wrote: > On 28 August 2013 07:44, Khem Raj wrote: > > meta-systemd currently has a bbappend which provides just a cover > > for udev-systemd, if we move this to the recipe proper then the > > bbappend can be removed from that layer > > If we do this for systemd we should do it for all recipes that were > part of meta-systemd. I thought we'd previously agreed that > meta-systemd would contain the "compatibility" provides for people > that had previously used meta-systemd, not oe-core. I concur with this. The bbappend should remain in meta-systemd, IMO. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre